|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
1954 SI Versus Reprint
Posted By: David
I have not owned Sports Illustrated #1 or the recent reprints. However, my guess is that the original Magazine/cards are phototengravings and the modern reprints are lithographs. Now, if you don't know how to tell the difference between photoengraving and lithography, that's because you were too cheap to buy my book. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
1954 SI Versus Reprint
Posted By: David
Most people poo-poo or get bored to tears by my insesent printing theory/history (I admit the insesent part), but it's in cases like this where I get the last laugh. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
1954 SI Versus Reprint
Posted By: Cy
David, |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
1954 SI Versus Reprint
Posted By: David
1) I definitely like to flaunt. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
1954 SI Versus Reprint
Posted By: Dan Mathewson
...I have to agree that David has been very forthcoming with his information in previous postings, especially in regards to his publication. As a fellow Seattle/Puget Sounder, I've actually met him in person and he is more than willing to talk the topic. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
1954 SI Versus Reprint
Posted By: David
For the record-- while everything I said in my earlier post was correct, I understood and understand that Cy was offering a sincere and thoughtful point of view. I also know for a fact that I can be a smart ass-- sadly, that's not likely to change any time soon, as I've been told I was one for nearly as long as I can remember. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
1954 SI Versus Reprint
Posted By: runscott
If someone on this board bought one of the SI reprints or some other piece of garbage, then complained that no one on the board would share knowledge with them when they asked about printing processes, it would be a different story - to the best of my knowledge this has never happened. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
1954 SI Versus Reprint
Posted By: David
I just went through my old newsletters, and the subjected of differentiating between lithography and photoengravings was covered at least once there-- so, I'm not going to cover it in the next newsletter. The newsletter barely got and gets any support, so I feel absolutley no guilt when people now complain that I don't diseminate information. While there were a few loyal supporters of the newsletter (from regular collectors to a few well known folks), most everyone else (including most, but not all, on this board) has never lifted a finger. This explains why I get touchy in the extreme when someone accuses me of not contributing information to the hobby, and why the newsletter goes on frequent vacations. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1954 Topps Aaron Reprint - East Coast National Show - info? | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 1 | 01-30-2009 07:24 PM |
1954 Topps Aaron Reprint - East Coast National Show - info? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 01-30-2009 04:20 PM |
Quality versus Quantity | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 01-02-2009 09:47 AM |
T206s versus 1933 Goudeys | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 03-14-2005 02:51 PM |
original goudeys versus reprints | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 02-03-2004 09:09 PM |