|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
I'll go with the #144 because I love those pinstripes against the colorful background and I am not a fan of oversized cards. Also, if a possible future sale is a consideration, the Goudey is on more want lists and thus likely more readily liquid. In the end, as many have said, one cannot go wrong; it all comes down to personal preference and it is always splitting hairs to some degree when choosing among Ruths, Mantles, Cobbs, any blue chip super desirable pieces.
__________________
instagram: mattyc_collection Last edited by MattyC; 06-27-2022 at 02:02 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Exhibitman - I missed it but am curious as to the Exhibit Ruth Portrait 5 grade to which you refer. Are you talking the 1926-29 Exhibit Postcard, Pose (holding bat) ? Or other? And which recent auction ? Thanks.
Steve |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... Last edited by Exhibitman; 06-27-2022 at 03:42 PM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Wow hadn’t seen that pose exhibit sale from goldin. A grade 1 just went for 9600 in heritage too!
__________________
Er1ck.L. ---D381 seeker http://www.flickr.com/photos/30236659@N04/sets/ |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
That one was a vg-ex looking card with a pinhole. But still, I never imagined that sort of valuation years ago when I was buying them. I guess I should have loaded up on as many as I could when they were $500 cards...
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I am usually partial to batting poses of hitters, but this fielding pose of Ruth is just perfect to me. The photographer caught him in a classic stance that wonderfully captures Ruth in his earliest days with the Yankees.
The Conlon batting pose is obviously a classic, but I have always thought that it looked too posed to me and I think that there are better batting images of Ruth that exist. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Nice exhibit issue but I’d think the 21 should bring substantially more in a 5 should one surface Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
I've been collecting for a very long time and it's always been the 33 Goudey 144. I didn't even know about the 21 until I read this post. There are so many random 20's cards of Ruth, but the Goudey is seared into peoples minds much like the 52 Mantle, 79 Gretzky, 86 Jordan, 89 Griffey, etc. I only bought mine because I love the card and the image, it's iconic and beautiful and my personal grail card. Best of luck on your journey. Trust your gut.
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB 1921 Ruth Exhibit, 26-29 Gehrig Exhibit | hcv123 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-16-2021 08:18 AM |
1933 Goudey Ruth 181 PSA 1 & Gehrig Exhibit PSA 4 | ezez420 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 12-21-2020 12:10 PM |
1921 Exhibit Ruth | sniffy5 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 08-26-2018 07:28 AM |
SOLD: Babe Ruth 1921 Exhibit *Could be nice for the entry level Ruth collector) | Paul S | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 05-22-2018 07:27 PM |
FS: 1921 Exhibit Babe Ruth & 1926 W511 Babe Ruth | pencil1974 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-17-2016 03:45 PM |