|
#101
|
|||
|
|||
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate.
Posted By: leon
I actually kiss them too.... AND I just hope I remember your face next time you knock on my door at home. I was so embarrassed. I will never forget that.....I know we had only met once before but still.....Talk to ya soon....btw, you need to hook me up with our IT purchasing dept ..... |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate.
Posted By: E, Daniel
Earliest card is always very cool to gaze upon, but has its own problems.....does the player's image need to be in sports uniform, or are portraits ok (aka N172 Anson)? And if portraits are ok, at what point do you establish that the person was engaged in their playing career such that it was not just 'school' ball, or other organized adolecent activities, or a family snap? If Cobb is captured at 14 in the card recently posted - showing him with other older players just pre his professional career, what exactly do we call that card? At what point does a family pic. become a baseball card worthy of being called their first? |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate.
Posted By: jeffdrum
To think or imply (and no one has, I don't think) that someone who "collects" graded cards is less of a collector than someone who only collects raw; to me is like saying someone is less of an accountant because he uses a calculator. |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate.
Posted By: peter chao
Daniel, |
#105
|
|||
|
|||
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate.
Posted By: davidcycleback
I always considered Exhibit cards to be trading cards. Excluding the argument about size, there were sold to the general public as collectibles. |
#106
|
|||
|
|||
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate.
Posted By: Joe D.
I love the slabs. |
#107
|
|||
|
|||
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate.
Posted By: peter chao
Joe, |
#108
|
|||
|
|||
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate.
Posted By: Frank Wakefield
Hey JeffDrum... |
#109
|
|||
|
|||
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate.
Posted By: jeffdrum
I have never taught math but I did teach Logic for two years @ Memphis State in the mid-80's when I was in grad school. Great fun to see the light go on in the students faces after working through a problem. |
#110
|
|||
|
|||
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate.
Posted By: Frank Wakefield
It is the collecting that is great... yes, sir. |
#111
|
|||
|
|||
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate.
Posted By: peter chao
Jeff, Frank, guys, |
#112
|
|||
|
|||
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate.
Posted By: jeffdrum
I do collect both............and you can call me anything you want. |
#113
|
|||
|
|||
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate.
Posted By: Frank Wakefield
Peter, |
#114
|
|||
|
|||
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate.
Posted By: peter chao
Frank, |
#115
|
|||
|
|||
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate.
Posted By: Gilbert Maines
I do not see any of this as subjective, borderline, nor open to interpretation. To me, an item is either a card, or it is not. If you hold it by its edge, and it does not support its own weight, it is not a card. Good bye Mello Mint, Dietsche, bread labels and other pieces of paper. |
#116
|
|||
|
|||
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate.
Posted By: peter chao
Guys, |
#117
|
|||
|
|||
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate.
Posted By: Frank Wakefield
Well I think that definition is crap... |
#118
|
|||
|
|||
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate.
Posted By: Rob Dewolf
"People may not agree with it but it is easy to understand." |
#119
|
|||
|
|||
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate.
Posted By: Frank Wakefield
I see your point. |
#120
|
|||
|
|||
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate.
Posted By: jeffdrum
Well if you are comfortable saying that the 1933 Goudey is Babe Ruth's rookie then Beckett is the way to go. If comfort and not being taken seriously is what you're after, then Beckett may be the way to go. |
#121
|
|||
|
|||
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate.
Posted By: peter chao
Jeff, |
#122
|
|||
|
|||
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate.
Posted By: VTRon
Naturally we all have opinions, so I'll add mine. |
#123
|
|||
|
|||
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate.
Posted By: Gilbert Maines
Before you consider what constitutes a rookie card (umm I may be a little late here), shouldn't you consider "why collect them in the first place"? |
#124
|
|||
|
|||
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate.
Posted By: Richard Masson
and that is exactly what dealers were thinking when they invented the "Rookie Card" and it helped to sell a lot of cards. |
#125
|
|||
|
|||
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate.
Posted By: Frank C
Great topic, good enough to lure me out of lurkdom... |
#126
|
|||
|
|||
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate.
Posted By: Anonymous
Hal Lewis probably has a pretty good list of HOF rookie cards, even though his definition of "card" is wrong and I would always prefer a Baltimore News Ruth to the M101. |
#127
|
|||
|
|||
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate.
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
Gee, I am surprised that this old thread has been reprised. Anyhow, I just wanted to say it was great meeting and talking with you, |
#128
|
|||
|
|||
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate.
Posted By: Phil Garry
Frank: |
#129
|
|||
|
|||
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate.
Posted By: Frank C
Phil, |
#130
|
|||
|
|||
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate.
Posted By: Jason L
Gil, please feel free to send me all your rookie cards that you do not want! |
#131
|
|||
|
|||
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate.
Posted By: Dan Paradis
Phil has a great book listing (with illustrations) each HOF'er's RC. We may not all agree with his definition of RC, but it's a great place to start. It seems like this would be the forum to promote your book Phil?? I love the book and review it every time I bid on a RC. |
#132
|
|||
|
|||
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate.
Posted By: Phil Garry
Thanks a lot, Dan. I'm glad you are enjoying the book and using it as a useful resource tool!!! |
#133
|
|||
|
|||
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate.
Posted By: Dan Paradis
Phil, that's exactly what I do. It seems to be getting more difficult (and a lot more expensive) lately to get a vintage HOF RC card!! Are there a lot of collectors who collect just HOF RC (as opposed to collecting sets)??? |
#134
|
|||
|
|||
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate.
Posted By: Josh Adams
Ted, |
#135
|
|||
|
|||
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate.
Posted By: peter chao
In Topps Allen and Ginter 2007, there's a Jack the Ripper Rookie Card. |
#136
|
|||
|
|||
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate.
Posted By: dennis
i define a rookie card as the 1st image (with his name) of a player on cardboard. very simple. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T206 Old Mill "Single Factory Overprint" & Cobb "Red Hindu" & "Uzit | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 04-14-2009 06:28 PM |
Marquard & Bush "Rookie" Cards . . . | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 06-24-2008 10:49 AM |
What is considered to be "Lefty" Groves rookie card? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 09-20-2007 05:19 AM |
Last night's "debate" .....some interesting observations. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 25 | 04-25-2004 06:52 PM |
Speaking of Harry Hooper, what is his "rookie?" | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 08-25-2002 01:35 PM |