![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Gee, those high grade E93s sure look altered to me. Thoughts?
A sample: PSA 9 Cobb: http://www.milehighcardco.com/LotDet...entoryid=39084 PSA 9 Wagner: http://www.milehighcardco.com/1910_E...-lot39083.aspx
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets Last edited by calvindog; 07-06-2015 at 09:19 AM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm not too sure, I'm no expert, keen too see everyone else's thoughts.
^ You might have to put you're full name under the post. -Owen
__________________
1955 Topps 171/206 ![]() Last edited by RaidonCollects; 03-20-2016 at 12:04 PM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'd rather not put my full name under my post.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm certainly not an expert, but other than looking too good to be true, what specifically makes you think these could be altered?
The bottom right corner of the Wagner does look a little off to me.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets Last edited by calvindog; 07-06-2015 at 10:16 AM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I guess I'm not seeing it either. The pic of the Cobb 5 is not even close to the 9 they would have to rebuild that bottom right corner so I would say that one is out. The 6 seems close but it has a diagonal line going from the edge to Cobbs shoulder area plus looks to be a black print dot beside his hat that is not on the 9 either.
Now the Wagner looks really close on the front with what we call in the print industry as a "hickey". Seems to be in the same place on the card but that can happen as I've seen them pull sheets in a run that the hickey is in the same spot of the first 20 sheets and is either fixed or fills in on its own as the run keeps going. There are a few spots on the back of the Wagner that are not on the example of the 6 (could be that the image quality is too bad but you should see it). So if I'm understanding the comparisons correctly they seem close but not exact. Just my opinion though. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() ![]() Same here - my first name is kind of weird
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS 51 Cards 1970 Topps All High Numbers High Grade! | Northviewcats | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 12-12-2014 01:53 PM |
1956 Mickey Mantle PSA 7 Rare HIGH END HIGH Grade | CollectiblesNJ | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 49 | 07-18-2013 01:31 PM |
For Trade My High Grade T206s for Your High Grade Cobb Portraits | RGold | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 3 | 11-28-2012 06:37 PM |
Mile High- T 209 Set | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 10-02-2008 01:13 PM |
High-grade E93s Wanted | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 01-20-2006 08:22 AM |