![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#51
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: runscott
This is what you do when backed in a corner. I have never contacted anyone's bidders prior to an auction ending. You're just tossing ideas up in the wind and hoping they fly. |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: runscott
... |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Kenny Cole
He's clearly out what he paid for it. However, I can see an argument to be made that he's out more. Assuming for the moment that it was the real deal and he bought it for less than it was worth with the intent to sell it, it can be argued that he is out his expected profit as well. Its that buy low, sell high thing that I just can't seem to get the knack of. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: runscott
He paid what the public thought it was worth. Nothing has changed since then. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dr.Koos
...values do change. |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dr.Koos
..please add Kenny's name to the list of those I've previously mentioned with the ability, usually taken for granted, of being able to think clearly. |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: runscott
If someone doesn't disagree with you, then they are sane. |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: runscott
...so I can get up and not go to work tomorrow. Wait a minute, maybe I'll be a doctor tomorrow...yeah, that's the ticket. |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: vorthian
<< A test auction on ebay may well be an effort to find out what the public (yes, I know its a private auction) thinks this particular card is worth. >> |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leonl
If he bought it, as he IS advertising it , then he could potentially say, that is what the value is since that is the way I bought it (albeit fraudelently)...and have more of a "market analysis" than just what HE paid for it....as most know a single auction, should not, but frequently does, set a market rate for near future sales...who on the board has not used the argument to buy a card cheaper by saying they saw a similar one cheaper....maybe Doc is trying to determine a market/legality issue...?? not sure but it could be possible....and the guy does have 605 positive feedbacks, from 372 unique users, with only 1 negative....if nothing else I will say try keeping 372 customers happy, each a few times, with only 1 pissed off person....and probably retalitory in that one.....that is just an overwhelming stat......and BTW , the darn card is at $10,100 as we speak....regards all |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dr.Koos
..Runscott and Brueso (ANOTHER cerebral individual), two bodies devoid of their severed chicken-heads, would have run rumpscottian up and down all my past bidders and winners trying to induce the same brand of friggin' (tm@T-Bob) hysteria they are prone to. Steve, you have NO idea how embarrassed I am for even addressing them. While YOU & I have to grin and bear it, I'll be damned if I'm going to subject my past winners and bidders to a spam barrage detailing their constantly shifting charges and madcap theories. |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Kenny Cole
Don't get peevish. I don't know the answers either. I am simply suggesting alternative possibilities that seem to make some degree of sense, at least to me. |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bruce Moreland
Anything is possible. |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dr.Koos
...many have said that the Mantle is restored, myself included (repeating what I read and was told and taking that verbatem), but nobody has come forward with "before" pictures, or even SECOND hand knowledge of what conservations were performed! |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dr.Koos
..about ME??? Your obsession with me is as unhealthy as your denial of it. Come on Scott. What's REALLY troubling you, son? Confide in us, it's for your own good. There are Boards I can recommend that will help with your inadequacies, whatever they may be, jSut (tm@Rumpscottian spelling)let it out and take that first "Baby-step". |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: runscott
...since you actually made a card-related post a moment ago (good job). |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: runscott
I don't have an archive folder of "posts and emails to be used against board members in the future", so I have no problem with accepting this explanation. If you thought it was trimmed purely because others told you so, and you didn't believe it yourself, then there's nothing wrong with you now rejecting their opinions and putting the card forth on ebay as you have done (I know I will catch hell for saying that). I can accept your old posts about the card being garbage, as just more senseless blathering, kind of like the references to male body fluids and back-sides, etc. |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian C Daniels
Now why would a known restorator take before pictures? |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
did your wife marry you becuase she thought she could get free shoes? |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dr.Koos
overwhelmingly positive feedback, 605-1, soon to be 605-0 once again as soon as Square Trade reverses the retailiatory negative from a RENEGGER, UNCONTESTED by him by NOT anwering any of Square Trade's communications asking for his side of the story, so important to you unless you desire to contact my past winners and bidders? What comments could I possibly be hiding? My feedback was 597-0 BEFORE the retaliatory negative, and MY FEEDBACK WAS ALREADY SHIELDED FOR THE PAST YEAR!!!! NOT recently. Face it! You're on a friggin' (tm@T-Bob) witch-hunt, nothing more. Your "humanitarian" efforts are as much a charade to shield personal shortcomings as they are unwarranted. Here...I'll prove it: Let's rate Runscott's performance! Who on this Board has his senseless prattle DISSUADED from bidding on the card? I'm sure that EVERYONE here was chomping at the bit to do bid-battling over it until Scott "Talked you out if it". |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: runscott
...magic mushrooms maybe? |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian C Daniels
and you do not address issues one by noe as you should so to your defense of one of the statements above YES,PRO is bogus ,we all know it and anything ala PRO is suspect.KOOS did not know that when he purchased thr mantle or the ****ful Joe Jackson card he has! |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dr.Koos
...it's the general concensus of an acquaintance. A clinical psychologist (would you like me to refer you to him?) who did me a favor in reading your posts, to confirm my suspicions of their agenda and content. |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: runscott
...does this one have the same credentials as you? |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dr.Koos
...it IS insane to disagree with what I am thinking, because you really have NO IDEA WHATSOEVER. You only THINK you know what I'm thinking, all of the possibilities of which are nefarious and deceitful in your way of thinking, because that is the way YOU are. You are projecting YOUR motives behind your own daily actions and schemes on ME and drawing illogical, insane conclusions based on your whimsy. It's ALWAYS like that. The guy with the biggest axe to grind has the smallest arms to weild it. |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dr.Koos
...candy-striper! Neurotics build castles in the air, psychotics live in them, and you clean the windows. |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dr.Koos
...Napoleonic complexes from a mile away. |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bureso
Maybe you and your colleague (I'd make a guess that he's actually the guy treating you) can spot them from a mile away because you suffer from one yourself. You seem to be the feel the NEED to include your "title" in your signature. There are numerous attorneys on the board who don't seem to need to add "Esquire"- there may be other doctors. But once again, you probably have another rationalization to excuse you from being subject to your insults to others. |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brueso
...come from the same educational institution (actually, probably "institution" by itself would suffice) as Dr. Johnny Fever from WKRP in Cincinatti. |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dr.Koos
..spell your screen name! Look at your last post!!! |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brueso
|
#82
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dr.Koos
...95% of them are addressed to you and Brueso. Well deserved commentary I might add, if you are capable of being insulted by absolute truth. Because YOU'RE in denial over your parasitic, compulsive personae, that has attatched you to me much like a pilot fish to a whale, doesn't mean that I'm not going to see you as you really are. |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dr.Koos
a Freudian slip! |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: runscott
but thanks for the offer |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: John(z28jd)
i say we should have a hall of fame for threads that were real good because of information thats in them,but i would also put this one in just for the amount of posts in it. If this ones ever off the first page we should retire it in a special section....oh yeah,free prize to whoever makes the 100th post in this thread! |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: David
Cut it up into tiny pieces and make memorabilia cards for the National |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Interesting Koos reading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 01-31-2004 04:47 PM |
Koos! Look now! ~ Quick bid it up!!! 15pts!*** | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 09-02-2002 05:51 PM |
Dr. Koos = Danny Dupcek? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 08-29-2002 08:10 AM |
Dr. Koos | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 08-09-2002 11:50 AM |
Useful Koos Posts - please list here | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 08-01-2002 01:51 AM |