 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
09-04-2024, 12:45 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Buying a Raw 1959 Topps Mickey Mantle, SGC "NO", & Dealer Responsibility
I bought a raw 1959 Topps Mickey Mantle at a local show recently and SGC has graded it a "NO". I don't have the card back in hand yet. Possible meaning of this: Counterfeit, Trimmed? If I remember correctly SGC would use COUNT for a counterfeit card, and "AUTH" for a card that is trimmed recolored, etc., so what exactly is a "NO"? I spent $700-ish on the card and was hoping it would grade a 5 or maybe slightly better for my PC.
Do you think the dealer has a responsibility to refund me or is this simply the admission price for buying raw? I have no reason to think it was an intentional thing and I've been on both ends of the buyer/seller table. So, I'm genuinely torn on what is fair/ethical. Unfortunately, I have no desire to own a card that didn't pass authentication, so a partial refund is out of the question. What do you think? Thanks in advance for your opinion, -Pat Last edited by mintacular; 09-04-2024 at 12:52 PM. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| "IMAGINE" (thank you, John Lennon)....Mickey Mantle's "rookie card" | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 06-12-2023 12:22 PM |
| 1957 topps #95 mickey mantle - " centered " - bvg 3 very good! | V117collector | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 06-09-2021 09:28 AM |
| Fs: 1957 topps #95 mickey mantle - " centered " - sgc 35 good+ 2.5 | V117collector | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 08-29-2018 08:49 PM |
| 1967 Topps #150 Mickey Mantle PSA 5 EX "Dead Centered", sold | mintacular | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 2 | 08-12-2015 06:04 AM |
| 1959 Topps #10 Mickey Mantle SGC 70 EX+ 5.5 "Dead Centered", $PENDING | mintacular | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 02-16-2015 10:46 AM |
Threaded Mode