|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Why should I care about "VCP Data" and "SMR Data"? Larry (I am lost when the terms "VCP Data" and "SMR" are used. A quick google search reveals that SMR means Sports Market Report and appears to be a price guide published by PSA. VCP (vintage card prices) their google search says they are "The authoritative baseball card value price guide" I think this is a subscription service. The terms "VCP Data" and "SMR" mean nothing to me. To establish pricing, I use the latest Standard Catalog, and past eBay sales. But these other "values" seem to be very important with some collectors.)
__________________
Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running on-line collecting club www.oldbaseball.com |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
After looking at your cards, I can assure you that you can safely ignore that "data". You are an outlier, my friend.
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Another reason rookie cards cost more is that they are collected by other than set-collectors. For instance, I'm a hall-of-fame collector, and at this point, having collected most of them, I especially try to get their rookie cards. There are others who only collect rookie cards. So, there's more demand and a larger market for them.
Also, to point out the obvious, it is the player's first season, and that makes the card more special. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have a stupid question: In the name "Net54" what does the "54"refer to?
Sent from my GT-I8190 using Tapatalk
__________________
T206: 130/518 ![]() T206 HZ: 6/6 ![]() T206 SLers: 48/48 ![]() T206 back run: 21/38
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
goose goosage perhaps....or love of the 1954 Topps because who likes mantle
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I dont recall there being 'rookie cards' for T206? Are there any HOF T206 'rookie' cards?
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Not a stupid question. Our old hosting company was Network54.com so the name of our forum "became that" before we did a complete host and s/w update. We kept the "Net54" in the url address because of name recognition. If you click the non sport icon in the far upper right corner of the board you will be taken to the non sports board and that companies hosting site.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Could bring wrong, but I believe the T206 Tris Speaker is his rookie.
Sent from my GT-I8190 using Tapatalk
__________________
T206: 130/518 ![]() T206 HZ: 6/6 ![]() T206 SLers: 48/48 ![]() T206 back run: 21/38
Last edited by BicycleSpokes; 07-09-2016 at 02:56 AM. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Why aren't the 150 series T206 worth more since they are older than the 350 and the 350 more than the 350-460?? It seems like in almost every other case, all else being equal the older cards are more expensive(33 vs. 34 Goudey Gehrig...)
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
According to Phil Garry's list
http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=141603 there are three: Marquard, hands at side, Frank Baker, and Zach Wheat. I take Phil's list to be the authority regarding h-o-f rookie cards. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
How were exhibit cards circulated?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Who holds the patent for the "bobbler", the mechanism that makes bobble heads bobble and not wobble?
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think the guy's name was Robert Bler.
__________________
Current projects: White Sox prewar type set White Sox T206 Master set 1952 Topps set |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Succinct and interesting read. Thank you! |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
REALLY dumb Question. Why are T206 Minors worth SMR wise even less than Commons.........Duh because they are Minors???.....Oh wait T205's Minors are worth More than the Commons...........
Last edited by Billy5858; 07-11-2016 at 03:23 AM. |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
T206 minor leaguers are pretty much just as common as normal commons, except for the Southern leaguers. At one time, they had higher book values than normal commons, again probably a popularity thing as there's a few subsets by league and team, and only a couple HOFers none of them particularly expensive. Some of them I think are marginally tougher than normal commons. Steve B |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Why hasn't someone taken Burdick's classification system and attempted to modernize and improve it?
|
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
What was the name of Ty Cobb's first organized team and in what league did they play?
|
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
The Brits have tried with something called the World Tobacco Index. Beckett and COMC are in the midst of creating large databases of cards electronically.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| probably a stupid question regarding psa/dna | milkit1 | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 5 | 07-21-2013 07:13 PM |
| Stupid question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 06-05-2007 02:57 PM |
| stupid question #44 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 10-07-2006 06:52 AM |
| I don't usually post stupid auctions | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 09-07-2006 03:07 PM |
| Using my stupid post allowance | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 08-25-2002 06:51 PM |