Response to NY Daily News Article

[pwilk17]

Jeff,

Please read this article - everyone on this board should read this article - it is an excellent read.

http://www.autographalert.com/news.html

There is a rumor that the people doing these dishonest things are now involved in management at SGC. Is this true? I sure hope not. You seem to dislike unethical dishonest people yourself Jeff which is commendable. Forman would not get involved with shady and dishonest and unethical people as business partners, would he? I am sure when he was heavily involved with Mastro that he believed they were 100% horourable and ethical.

[calvindog]

Peter,

When rumors are taken to court or investigated by a federal grand jury I'll respond. When you are willing to put up 400K of your own money because you think a rumor is more than a rumor, I'll respond.

[jmk59]

Yikes. Far be it for me to defend Mr. Lichtman, but there is no way in hell he can come on here and start saying negative (and even potentially criminal) things about his client out of some vague interest in balanced discussion. No lawyer can do that and be a lawyer for long - both their clients and their licenses will be gone or at risk.

Others - Mastro counsel, semi-interested readers, even you, Peter - can bring up what they want about either party, good or bad, in a thread like this. But the last person with the responsibility to bring up anything negative about one side is counsel for that side.

Sorry Peter - while I can see that your concern is for a balanced discussion about something that is important to you, it is probably not fair to expect Jeff to lead the conversation.

Joann Kline.

[Fuddjcal]

Originally Posted by pwilk17

Jeff,

Please read this article - everyone on this board should read this article - it is an excellent read.

http://www.autographalert.com/news.html

There is a rumor that the people doing these dishonest things are now involved in management at SGC. Is this true? I sure hope not. You seem to dislike unethical dishonest people yourself Jeff which is commendable. Forman would not get involved with shady and dishonest and unethical people as business partners, would he? I am sure when he was heavily involved with Mastro that he believed they were 100% horourable and ethical.

It's an excellent read if you print it out and wipe your A** with it.

While there is no excuse for JSA to charge for a service, where they automatically re-buff authenticity based on a "previous" authentication of Christopher Moralass, the reality is that those are probably the ONLY AUTHENTIC EXAMPLES MORALLESS has ever authenticated and he had to peel off someone else stickers to do it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

So while we would like to see JSA look at items more carefully and be held to a higher standard, they are NOT Crooks. Incompetent at times maybe, but when you compare them to a complete loser, who is tied in with many fraud rings, you are entirely missing the point of the lunatic that runs AA.

Before you call JSA dishonest, you need to do some more research other than the slanted narrow view points from the creators of AA.

[Rich Klein]

Type in the Words Stephen Koschal + ***** and see where it leads. He has his own very vested interest but is far from an angel himself

Rich

[slidekellyslide]

Originally Posted by jmk59

Yikes. Far be it for me to defend Mr. Lichtman, but there is no way in hell he can come on here and start saying negative (and even potentially criminal) things about his client out of some vague interest in balanced discussion. No lawyer can do that and be a lawyer for long - both their clients and their licenses will be gone or at risk.

Others - Mastro counsel, semi-interested readers, even you, Peter - can bring up what they want about either party, good or bad, in a thread like this. But the last person with the responsibility to bring up anything negative about one side is counsel for that side.

Sorry Peter - while I can see that your concern is for a balanced discussion about something that is important to you, it is probably not fair to expect Jeff to lead the conversation.

Joann Kline.

What I find amazing is that the two parties in a major civil suit would even discuss any of it on a public forum...where else on the internet does that happen? Net54baseball rocks!

[calvindog]

What's more amazing is that Doug has given more comments about the litigation to Net 54 than all the people here who predicted that this litigation would be disastrous for Dave.