![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: Which grading company do you prefer? | |||
SGC |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
85 | 69.11% |
PSA |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
37 | 30.08% |
Beckett- BVG |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 0.81% |
Voters: 123. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
SGC for prewar. PSA for postwar.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Maybe we can do a more specific poll later but, again, I didn't really want to change anything with the original poster's question...
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 10-19-2009 at 10:27 AM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I Think SGC /PSA are equally as good and both company’s are subject to human error regarding inaccurate grading. That being said my first choice would be SGC due to having supported black inserts within there graded containers. There’s no real difference between the two leading grading companies.
I also believe the poll should add Beckett as well. This top three grading companies should be represented as legitimate grading source. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
A "prewar" card just looks far superior in an Sgc holder.
Both visually and condition related. Tony A. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Right on-- sgc pre war psa post war
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I use and like both and there are advantages to using both companies.
So I can't vote since the choice is either/or. Perhaps a couple more options like .... c) like them both d) do not like either will help gauge the voting, so more can respond. Last edited by Jay Wolt; 10-19-2009 at 10:48 AM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I typically buy cards that are already in a SGC or PSA holder. On occasion I find a card that is not graded and want to get it graded. I had a unique card that I wanted confirmation that they could grade it before I sent it to them. Both companies at first were hesitant but after providing documentation to support the card, SGC agreed to grade it. PSA spent 2 weeks reviewing my documentation and never proactivley contacted me back. At that point I called PSA to see what their decision was. They then told me to send it in with payment and if they could not grade it, I would get a credit from them for grading of another card. That did not impress me and sounds like they wanted my money before they would agree or disagree. I wasn't wanting a specific grade but just wanted them to confirm or deny it was a valid card (Authentic Grade).
Last edited by Batter67up; 10-19-2009 at 12:28 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sold | Zact | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 11-02-2009 12:01 PM |
FS: T206 Southern Leaguers (10 different) - both SGC & PSA - VG / VG+ | Adam | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 9 | 08-22-2009 05:02 PM |
1934 Goudey 17 card lot - PSA & SGC Graded | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-01-2009 07:59 PM |
Memory Lane Redux? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 162 | 04-18-2007 05:51 PM |
PSA Graded T-206's for Sale | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 4 | 09-21-2006 09:19 PM |