 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7
05-23-2007, 10:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
old PSA vs. new PSA ???
Posted By: JimB
I think it is bull#@%*. I have plenty of cards that were accurately graded by PSA ten years ago. I often think they were more rigorous then than they are now. If the seller does not want full auction value for the card without having to pay an auctions house to handle it for him, he is an idiot. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1953 Howell RC PSA 7 1961 DeJordy RC PSA 7 1965 Cheevers RC PSA 7.5 For Sale | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 01-15-2009 10:30 AM |
| -Sold- 1984 Fleer Update Set with (3) Pucketts PSA 7, 8, 9 (1) Clemens PSA 8 (oc) | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 12-03-2008 10:17 AM |
| WTT T205 Cobb PSA 4 for T206 Cy Young Port. PSA/SGC 4-5 | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 08-03-2008 11:08 PM |
| FS-T207's Mullin No D PSA 6 (highest graded),McDonald PSA 6 (1 higher), Henry PSA 3 | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 12-03-2007 05:30 AM |
| T206 Baker AB PSA 3 & Chase Carolina Brights PSA 2 SOLD | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 12-18-2005 06:31 PM |
Threaded Mode