![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dave S
E145-2's are a different ball of wax, don't really think there are any overly tough ones, none I'd consider scarce. You might have to dig deep in the bankroll to get a few, but they're out there. Some of the commons actually tougher to find than the big money, big name cards. Think if you look at pop. reports you'll find some crazy numbers, possibly because the average guy may not want to slab a common as often as a HOF'er. I've found these 4 commons to be tougher availability-wise than most of the big guys of the set: Fisher (102), Lavender (105), Suggs (113), and Barger(141). Suggs and Barger in particular REALLY tough in decent shape. Maybe most kids threw the commons in the trash? |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1914 B18 Blankets question (need help on deadline) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 04-13-2007 02:08 PM |
1914 Baltimore News Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 02-24-2007 02:52 PM |
1914 CrackerJack question??? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 11-21-2005 11:43 AM |
Re: 1914 Cracker Jack question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 10-07-2005 05:46 PM |
1914 Cracker Jack Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 03-07-2005 09:59 PM |