![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mike Campbell
All cards I have gotten back, are fairly graded. Not better than should be, nor worse. I see no difference in there 1st, 2nd, or 3rd's. I see no logic in applying more importance to a card, just because it is the first one of it's kind to be given a specific grade. If they are being more stringent, or less stringent, then they are not doing their job very well. A grade, is a grade, is a grade. No matter if it first last, or middle. I don't want cards that are overgraded. I want cards that are correctly graded. Because if they are overgrading mine, that means they are overgrading some elses. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
F/S 1952 GAI 7 Mantle 311 1st graded | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-22-2008 09:02 AM |
1st graded sham | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 10-28-2005 08:12 PM |
T215 Red Cross Cobb for sale - 1st come, 1st served. | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 09-08-2005 01:11 AM |
Is this a joke? Was this card graded on April 1st? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 01-26-2005 10:22 PM |
1st Graded Card of Negro League HOFer | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 04-23-2002 01:33 AM |