![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Geno
Maybe the reason that there is little demand from vintage collectors is because we all just keep the old ones since there is little reason to buy a new one. It is not price prohibitive, rather it just takes up space and contains 70% junk. If it were broken into two volumes, I think vintage collectors like ourselves would gladly pony up $25 a year for one of them with updated prices. The reason there is no perceived demand is because the product supplied does not meet the demand. I looked at the website and saw stuff like the Professional Wrestlers Encyclopedia - I mean come on, there has to be more vintage baseball collectors than Hulk Hogan collectors! |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lemke Catalog Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 06-05-2007 03:39 PM |
A suggestion for Bob Lemke and the Standard Catalog | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 02-06-2006 04:31 PM |
SCD Catalog, Standard Catalog, Checklists | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 12-07-2005 08:45 PM |
Standard Catalog | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 11-27-2004 07:46 AM |
Ask the Standard Catalog . . . | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 01-12-2004 02:21 PM |