|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
[QUOTE=jacksoncoupage;2419844][QUOTE=Pat R;2419828]
Quote:
There seem to be 3 or 4 different groups that a particular variation can be placed in and I think that had to do with the printing stages that can be broken down into A-B-C or A-B-C-D. What I mean by that is I think each printing was kind of like an assembly line. I really only collected baseball cards and a very small amount of football cards back then so I don't know the timeframe on the basketball and hockey that well. I know topps printed a wide variety of cards but if I'm not mistaken the 4 sports were their biggest volume. The 91 baseball printing probably started when they were in the middle to the end of either the 90 basketball or hockey printing and that's where I think the A printing of the 91 baseball started before moving to to the B and possibly C printing when the 90 basketball or hockey was finishing up. When the 91 football printing got in full swing that's when the C and or D period of the 91 baseball printing stage started. I think that's where the variations are broken down into groups with the scarce variations printed in either the A or C/D stage and the common variations were printed in between. The #21 Joe Morgan card is a good example of the different stages. there are 3 or 4 different variations I think I have one where the top of the 1 is clipped off but I couldn't locate it to see if it is the "tilted" or regular printed variation but either way I think it was just a period where there was some kind of obstruction for a short period during one of those printings. The 87 hits was printed during the A stage and it is actually scarce enough that it might have shared that stage with the "tilted" 1 variation. I think the "tilted" variation was printed during part of the B stage and possibly the A stage also before the correction was made and the regular 187 was printed for the remainder of the printing. [IMG][/IMG] [IMG][/IMG] [IMG][/IMG] While looking for the clipped variation I found the higher 1 variation that I had forgot about. I had it with some other early variations so I think it might have been the first 187 variation. img538.jpg I also noticed that the tilted 1 variation has a bunch of lines in the inner pink areas that the other variations don't have. I will have to check and see if all of the tilted 1's have these. img534 - Copy.jpg Last edited by Pat R; 03-15-2024 at 04:41 PM. Reason: Added the higher 1 and tilted 1 with lines info |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Amazing stuff, but I am sticking with just my 2 versions of Morgan
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Do the partial bold logos seem to be a fairly scarce print flaw to others or is it just what I'm experiencing with the 91 Topps that I have?
91 Topps partial bold logo.jpg |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
I'm in the process of trying to come up with a printing timeline on the corrections that were made to some of the errors. I will post what I know when I get everything organized but here is some of what I have so far. Some of the early corrections were Chamberlain and Mattingly 101 hits while some of the latest corrections were Comstock Mariners and the Bradley #717 and McReynolds #105 checklists.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I have found over and over again that Mattingly was a later correction. I have opened boxes as recently as December 2023 that had corrected Comstocks and Mattinglys with 10 hits.
__________________
JunkWaxGems - Showcasing the rare, little-known and sometimes mysterious cards of the 1980s and 1990s. https://junkwaxgems.wordpress.com/ Oddball, promos and variations:http://www.comc.com/Users/JunkWaxGems,sr |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Maybe I'm wrong about the Mattingly. I have opened a few boxes that I documented and kept separated and I thought I had a couple of Mattingly 101 hits variations in an earlier box. I have everything documented but I haven't looked all of the information over thoroughly yet. I do know that I have 25-30 Comstocks and only one is the Mariner variation. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Certain variations were found in only one of those packaging types (Whiten, Drabek, Hoiles errors for example) while their common corrected versions could be found in both packaging types. Meanwhile, other variation-affected cards could be found in both types of packaging, also in both their error or corrected version depending on what time in the print run.
__________________
JunkWaxGems - Showcasing the rare, little-known and sometimes mysterious cards of the 1980s and 1990s. https://junkwaxgems.wordpress.com/ Oddball, promos and variations:http://www.comc.com/Users/JunkWaxGems,sr |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1991 Topps Baseball Error/Variations question | butchie_t | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 24 | 11-02-2021 09:55 AM |
1991 Topps Variations | toppcat | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 21 | 11-02-2020 04:20 PM |
1991 Score Variations | deweyinthehall | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 1 | 11-02-2020 03:33 PM |
1991 Topps Glow Backs/variations/game cards | judsonhamlin | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 0 | 01-20-2020 08:13 AM |
FS: Chipper Jones Rookies: 1991 Topps and 1991 O-Pee-Chee PSA 10! | wilkiebaby11 | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 1 | 10-06-2015 02:51 PM |