![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This was like a 2K card with an obviously bad scan, not a major sale. I have no doubt ML would have refunded the money once they got the card and confirmed the error/bad scan, regardless of Travis bringing it up here, as the mistake was that clear.
You guys can't really think that ML is in the business of ripping people off for a thousand or two thousand bucks? If anything, and I don't speak for ML -- they surely could have been pissed about this being outed before they were given the chance to rectify it. I don't blame Travis for doing so, it's a hobby issue and he's certainly allowed. But the negative backlash occurred before they had the chance to make things right and they're not the auction house known for misleading scans. They could be a bit pissed. No auction house is perfect and shit can happen with so many lots. In this hobby, if an error is fixed painlessly, we should celebrate it.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Here ya go. Note the shoes!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GwjfUFyY6M Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets Last edited by calvindog; 04-18-2024 at 11:03 AM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm paying devils attorney..ahem advocate. Card was /is psa 1. It's hard to cheat and honest man. If it looked like a 3 candidate and made you think "hmm", remember all eyes are watching, including those running the auction. Nobody is letting that thing go.
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This PSA 1 1933 Goudey Lou Gehrig (cert 78153729) lot result went as expected (meaning what happens when this card was properly photographed and described).
Jan 13th auction. 14 bids. Final price w/ fees = $3763.20 May 4th auction. 11 bids. Final price w/ fees = $2546.40 About -32% price diff. We in the hobby should continue to demand auction houses use proper descriptions and raw images and not enhanced w/ photo editing software. This would benefit everyone. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Last edited by tjisonline; 05-06-2024 at 09:46 AM. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
i'm more worried about auction houses stop w/ the vague descriptions and enhanced images. i went through the latter w/ the 68 3-D Clemente search. Enough is enough. Last edited by tjisonline; 05-06-2024 at 07:14 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Memory Lane Memory Lane!!! | ullmandds | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 08-25-2022 03:58 PM |
Memory Lane | calvindog | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 08-13-2017 12:01 AM |
Memory Lane - Anyone win anything?? | bobbyw8469 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 05-06-2011 10:39 PM |
Memory Lane | Orioles1954 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 08-09-2009 12:45 AM |
Will Memory Lane EVER end? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 12-16-2006 04:18 AM |