|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
1967 Topps 6th Series
So, when I began to work on a 1967 set earlier this year, I knew the 7th series was going to kick my butt (and my wallet), but the 6th series?
I get that cards generally get increasingly harder to find as you move up series to series, culminating in the high series. But, looking on line so many 6th series commons (not exactly in MT condition, either) are priced more than many 7th series common DPs. What's odd is that the stars (Palmer, Marichal, Killebrew etc) don't seem to carry proportionate premiums...in other words if commons are often listed between 10-20, the stars can be had for 30-50 in nice shape. With the pricing on the commons, I would have expected the stars to be around 80-100, especially a 2nd year Palmer. So the question I have is this - is this just more silliness in this season of vintage silliness, or does the 6th series carry genuine production/distribution/scarcity issues like the 7th? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
f/s 1967 TOPPS #51 ASTROS ROOKIE STARS,1967 TOPPS #167 SENATORS ROOKIES | megalimey | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 01-29-2020 09:51 AM |
CLOSED: 1967 Topps 400+ Cards - Series 1-6: ENDS 2NITE Mon 6/12 | Paul S | Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. | 7 | 06-12-2017 08:27 PM |
FS: 1967 Low Number Series Near Complete Set | ynnek4 | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 17 | 09-25-2015 01:08 PM |
WTTF: 1967 Topps & 1972 Topps High Numbers - have 1967's and HOFers to trade | GehrigFan | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 06-14-2015 02:09 PM |
F/T: (3) 1967 stragglers (5th series) | SmokyBurgess | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 04-16-2011 07:46 AM |