NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Postwar Sportscard Forums > Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-14-2021, 06:50 PM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is online now
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 32,057
Default 6 HOF RCs in one year

1991 may never be topped:
Mussina
C. Jones
Thome
P. Martinez
Bagwell
I. Rodriguez

I think I only came up with one year where there were 5, 1957:
F Robinson
B. Robinson
Bunning
Drysdale
Mazeroski

But I may be missing something.

2018 has a lot of promising players, we'll see.
__________________
My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at
https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/

He is available to do custom drawings in graphite, charcoal and other media. He also sells some of his works as note cards/greeting cards on Etsy under JamesSpaethArt.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-14-2021, 07:01 PM
G1911 G1911 is online now
Gr.eg McCl.@y
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 7,117
Default

If you use Beckett, T206 has like 30 of ‘em
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-14-2021, 07:04 PM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is online now
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 32,057
Default

This is a post-war section, son.
__________________
My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at
https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/

He is available to do custom drawings in graphite, charcoal and other media. He also sells some of his works as note cards/greeting cards on Etsy under JamesSpaethArt.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-14-2021, 08:09 PM
Gr8Beldini Gr8Beldini is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 462
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth View Post
1991 may never be topped:
Mussina
C. Jones
Thome
P. Martinez
Bagwell
I. Rodriguez

I think I only came up with one year where there were 5, 1957:
F Robinson
B. Robinson
Bunning
Drysdale
Mazeroski

But I may be missing something.

2018 has a lot of promising players, we'll see.
1957 also includes RC of Whitey Herzog.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-14-2021, 08:10 PM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is online now
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 32,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gr8Beldini View Post
1957 also includes RC of Whitey Herzog.
True, but to my mind that doesn't count.
__________________
My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at
https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/

He is available to do custom drawings in graphite, charcoal and other media. He also sells some of his works as note cards/greeting cards on Etsy under JamesSpaethArt.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-14-2021, 09:06 PM
Vegas Cards Vegas Cards is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Posts: 355
Default

Okay, next step is figuring out the most collectible RC for each player.

How much will you give me for a nicely centered 1991 Topps Chipper Jones PSA 8?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-14-2021, 09:21 PM
Casey2296's Avatar
Casey2296 Casey2296 is offline
Is Mudville so bad?
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: West Coast
Posts: 5,120
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vegas Cards View Post
Okay, next step is figuring out the most collectible RC for each player.

How much will you give me for a nicely centered 1991 Topps Chipper Jones PSA 8?
Interesting question, monetarily would be 51 Bowman, I think next would be 54 Topps.
__________________
Phil Lewis


https://www.flickr.com/photos/183872512@N04/
-
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-15-2021, 05:16 AM
rats60's Avatar
rats60 rats60 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,968
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Casey2296 View Post
Interesting question, monetarily would be 51 Bowman, I think next would be 54 Topps.
I think it is 1949 Leaf, 1951 Bowman, 1955 Topps, 1954 Topps, 1952 Topps.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-15-2021, 05:23 AM
rats60's Avatar
rats60 rats60 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,968
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by G1911 View Post
If you use Beckett, T206 has like 30 of ‘em
If you use PSA, 1949 Leaf has 9 because they think the set was released in 1948 despite all of the cards having stats from the 1948 season. The real number is 5 with the other 4 having 1948 Bowman cards.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-15-2021, 03:03 PM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is online now
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 32,057
Default

How about years with none? 1953, right? And only one from 1956 and 1958 and 1959 (counting only players not managers). 1950, none also I think.
__________________
My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at
https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/

He is available to do custom drawings in graphite, charcoal and other media. He also sells some of his works as note cards/greeting cards on Etsy under JamesSpaethArt.

Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 06-15-2021 at 03:06 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-15-2021, 03:11 PM
packs packs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,831
Default

No rookies in 1955 Bowman either are there?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-15-2021, 03:13 PM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is online now
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 32,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by packs View Post
No rookies in 1955 Bowman either are there?
No but I was thinking in terms of years not sets.

Also none in 1970. 1985?
__________________
My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at
https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/

He is available to do custom drawings in graphite, charcoal and other media. He also sells some of his works as note cards/greeting cards on Etsy under JamesSpaethArt.

Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 06-15-2021 at 03:14 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-15-2021, 05:22 PM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is online now
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 32,057
Default

1988 weighs in with 5: Alomar, Biggio, Glavine, Smoltz, and E. Martinez.
__________________
My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at
https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/

He is available to do custom drawings in graphite, charcoal and other media. He also sells some of his works as note cards/greeting cards on Etsy under JamesSpaethArt.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-16-2021, 08:23 PM
rats60's Avatar
rats60 rats60 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,968
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth View Post
No but I was thinking in terms of years not sets.

Also none in 1970. 1985?
1985 has Kirby Puckett.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-16-2021, 09:26 PM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is online now
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 32,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rats60 View Post
1985 has Kirby Puckett.
No, 1984 has Kirby Puckett. I don't buy that XRC nonsense Jim Beckett came up with. IMO, his only RC is 1984 Fleer Update.
__________________
My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at
https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/

He is available to do custom drawings in graphite, charcoal and other media. He also sells some of his works as note cards/greeting cards on Etsy under JamesSpaethArt.

Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 06-16-2021 at 09:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-16-2021, 10:02 PM
rats60's Avatar
rats60 rats60 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,968
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth View Post
No, 1984 has Kirby Puckett. I don't buy that XRC nonsense Jim Beckett came up with. IMO, his only RC is 1984 Fleer Update.
Who is your rookie in 1986? Agree to disagree on Puckett. It was the hobby and collectors not Beckett who decided that rookie cards had to be available to the majority of collectors and not regionals or limited releases like 1984 Fleer Update.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-17-2021, 12:14 PM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is online now
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 32,057
Default

You're right, no 1986 either, although I suspect McGriff and/or Bonds eventually will make it.

I just don't see how you can call a 1985 Puckett a rookie when he has a nationally distributed card from a top three brand in 1984, but whatever.
__________________
My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at
https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/

He is available to do custom drawings in graphite, charcoal and other media. He also sells some of his works as note cards/greeting cards on Etsy under JamesSpaethArt.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-17-2021, 12:15 PM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is online now
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 32,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rats60 View Post
Who is your rookie in 1986? Agree to disagree on Puckett. It was the hobby and collectors not Beckett who decided that rookie cards had to be available to the majority of collectors and not regionals or limited releases like 1984 Fleer Update.
So why is 1992 Topps Traded Garciaparra indisputably his rookie card? And 1991 Topps Traded Bagwell and I Rod? And the 1989 Griffey traded and update cards? And the 1988 Alomar and Biggio traded and update cards? The only difference I see is that Beckett dropped the XRC after 1987.
__________________
My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at
https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/

He is available to do custom drawings in graphite, charcoal and other media. He also sells some of his works as note cards/greeting cards on Etsy under JamesSpaethArt.

Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 06-17-2021 at 12:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-17-2021, 01:01 PM
frankbmd's Avatar
frankbmd frankbmd is offline
Fr@nk Burke++
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Between the 1st tee and the 19th hole
Posts: 7,391
Default

All disputes in this thread may be attributed to rookie mistakes.
__________________
FRANK:BUR:KETT - RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER NUMBER FATHER.

GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH NON-FUNGIBLES


274/1000 Monster Number


Nearly*1000* successful B/S/T transactions completed from 2012 to 2024.
Over 680 sales with satisfied Board members served.
If you want fries with your order, just speak up.
Thank you all.



Now nearly PQ.

Last edited by frankbmd; 06-17-2021 at 01:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-17-2021, 03:24 PM
rats60's Avatar
rats60 rats60 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,968
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth View Post
You're right, no 1986 either, although I suspect McGriff and/or Bonds eventually will make it.

I just don't see how you can call a 1985 Puckett a rookie when he has a nationally distributed card from a top three brand in 1984, but whatever.
Calling a set that most card shops didn't order and was never available at retail a "national" distribution is a stretch. Michael Jordan's RC is universally recognized as the 1986 Fleer and not the Star issues that had similar distribution problems and were the only NBA license at the time.

1986 Topps Traded was the first set of its kind to have any type of wide spread distribution. That would be differentiating point to me. Sets that are restricted from the collecting public intentionally by manufacturers don't meet the RC definition. A RC should be widely available to the hobby, not just to a select few.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 06-17-2021, 03:46 PM
ALR-bishop ALR-bishop is offline
Al Richter
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 9,150
Default

I collected all Topps, Fleer and original Bowman sets. A lot of folks do not think you need the Traded/Update sets to be complete. I do but have no idea how many set collectors have the 84 Fleer Traded set. I would bet however that every Kirby Puckett master collector has his 84 Fleer card
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 06-17-2021, 05:48 PM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is online now
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 32,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rats60 View Post
Calling a set that most card shops didn't order and was never available at retail a "national" distribution is a stretch. Michael Jordan's RC is universally recognized as the 1986 Fleer and not the Star issues that had similar distribution problems and were the only NBA license at the time.

1986 Topps Traded was the first set of its kind to have any type of wide spread distribution. That would be differentiating point to me. Sets that are restricted from the collecting public intentionally by manufacturers don't meet the RC definition. A RC should be widely available to the hobby, not just to a select few.
It won't come as any surprise that I view the 101 as Jordan's true rookie.

I'll go with first officially licensed card in a major league set. I think that works across the board for me but maybe there are exceptions. Qualities such as "readily available" are too subjective for me.

How do you feel btw about cards in Topps Tiffany and Fleer Glossy sets? Those were intentionally restricted, yes?
__________________
My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at
https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/

He is available to do custom drawings in graphite, charcoal and other media. He also sells some of his works as note cards/greeting cards on Etsy under JamesSpaethArt.

Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 06-17-2021 at 05:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-17-2021, 06:24 PM
shagrotn77's Avatar
shagrotn77 shagrotn77 is offline
Andrew Mc.Gann
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 619
Default

It’s pretty simple: rookie card = first card. That’s the whole draw of rookie cards, to have the player’s first card. And, of course, I’m not including minor league issues since they’re a whole different ballgame. The whole XRC thing is and always was nonsense. If you really think 1985 is the year for rookie cards for Kirby Puckett, Roger Clemens, Dwight Gooden, etc., then you just don’t get it.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 06-17-2021, 09:14 PM
wdwfan wdwfan is offline
Emlily Ell.is
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,187
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shagrotn77 View Post
It’s pretty simple: rookie card = first card. That’s the whole draw of rookie cards, to have the player’s first card. And, of course, I’m not including minor league issues since they’re a whole different ballgame. The whole XRC thing is and always was nonsense. If you really think 1985 is the year for rookie cards for Kirby Puckett, Roger Clemens, Dwight Gooden, etc., then you just don’t get it.
So with that mindset, is the 2009 Bowman Chrome Trout considered his RC? Or is it 2011? I've always though of 2011 as his rookie year and not 2009. Same way I think 1985 is Puckett's rookie year and not 1984.
__________________
Anyone on Twitter? Here's my new handle
@1millionrangers

I have done deals with: snowman, exhibitman, roquan, vintagetoppscards, bobsbbcards, sayitaintso, tsp06, gorditadogg, 4reals, bnorth, clydepepper, jcfowler6, jimmer77, tsp06, Bartholomew_Bump_Bailey, swk473 plus others.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 06-18-2021, 09:52 AM
todeen's Avatar
todeen todeen is offline
Tim Odeen
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 3,063
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wdwfan View Post
So with that mindset, is the 2009 Bowman Chrome Trout considered his RC? Or is it 2011? I've always though of 2011 as his rookie year and not 2009. Same way I think 1985 is Puckett's rookie year and not 1984.
The 2011 cards are his RC, first year in the majors. The Bowman 1st cards have become popular, but those players are in the minors, and those sets are correctly labeled as Draft Pick, etc, and should be viewed as a minor league card. But, first cards have been and remain popular. Derek Jeter in 1992, Joey Votto in 2002, and Mike Trout in 2009.

And then there was MLB and Topps decision to create the official RC stamp that creates further confusion about 1990 RCs.

Because Topps Traded in the 1980s are generally recognized as RC, I consider any 1980s Traded set to be a RC. I disagree with XRC labels.

Note: this argument is meant solely for modern 1980 - present.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
__________________
Barry Larkin, Joey Votto, Tris Speaker, 1930-45 Cincinnati Reds, T206 Cincinnati
Successful deals with: Banksfan14, Brianp-beme, Bumpus Jones, Dacubfan (x5), Dstrawberryfan39, Ed_Hutchinson, Fballguy, fusorcruiser (x2), GoCalBears, Gorditadog, Luke, MikeKam, Moosedog, Nineunder71, Powdered H20, PSU, Ronniehatesjazz, Roarfrom34, Sebie43, Seven, and Wondo

Last edited by todeen; 06-18-2021 at 09:55 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 06-18-2021, 10:04 AM
Exhibitman's Avatar
Exhibitman Exhibitman is offline
Ad@m W@r$h@w
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Beautiful Downtown Burbank
Posts: 13,534
Default

1954 Topps was pretty spectacular in terms of quality: Aaron, Banks, Kaline. All are top-tier HOFers.

1975 Topps had a pretty good run too: Brett, Yount, Rice, Carter.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true.

https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/

Or not...
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 06-18-2021, 10:20 AM
packs packs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,831
Default

The 1949 Bowman set has a lot more rookies than I remembered too:

Campy
Early Wynn
Robin Roberts
Richie Ashburn
Duke Snider
Bob Lemon

And could break the tie at 6 if Hodges ever gets in.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 06-18-2021, 01:37 PM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is online now
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 32,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Exhibitman View Post
1954 Topps was pretty spectacular in terms of quality: Aaron, Banks, Kaline. All are top-tier HOFers.

1975 Topps had a pretty good run too: Brett, Yount, Rice, Carter.
1955 -- Koufax, Killebrew and Clemente.
__________________
My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at
https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/

He is available to do custom drawings in graphite, charcoal and other media. He also sells some of his works as note cards/greeting cards on Etsy under JamesSpaethArt.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 06-18-2021, 01:54 PM
egri's Avatar
egri egri is offline
Sco.tt Mar.cus
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 1,803
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Exhibitman View Post
1954 Topps was pretty spectacular in terms of quality: Aaron, Banks, Kaline. All are top-tier HOFers.

1975 Topps had a pretty good run too: Brett, Yount, Rice, Carter.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth View Post
1955 -- Koufax, Killebrew and Clemente.
1951 Bowman had Mantle, Mays, and Ford.
__________________
Signed 1953 Topps set: 264/274 (96.35 %)
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 06-18-2021, 04:28 PM
JustinD's Avatar
JustinD JustinD is offline
Ju$tin D@v3n.por+
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Birmingham, Mi
Posts: 2,884
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth View Post
No, 1984 has Kirby Puckett. I don't buy that XRC nonsense Jim Beckett came up with. IMO, his only RC is 1984 Fleer Update.
Here, here!

XRC is sham, 1985 Mcgwire is not an XRC and is not even a major league card...

The emperor has no clothes over there in their designations.

For me personally, I consider the first card issued in a major league uni the RC and agree fully that includes the Star sets, the 86' Fleer is years away from being a RC and easily the most overvalued and over hyped card in the hobby other than the 2nd year 1952 Mantle which is first place hands down.

I know that not everyone has the same thoughts nor do I expect them to. These are my thoughts and beliefs and I would personally never call either a rookie.
__________________
- Justin D.


Player collecting - Lance Parrish, Jim Davenport, John Norlander.

Successful B/S/T with - Highstep74, Northviewcats, pencil1974, T2069bk, tjenkins, wilkiebaby11, baez578, Bocabirdman, maddux31, Leon, Just-Collect, bigfish, quinnsryche...and a whole bunch more, I stopped keeping track, lol.

Last edited by JustinD; 06-18-2021 at 04:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 06-18-2021, 04:37 PM
Chris Counts's Avatar
Chris Counts Chris Counts is offline
Chris Counts
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,764
Default

The '49 Bowman set also has Larry Doby and George Kell, along with Jackie Robinson and Satchel Paige, whose true rookies are up for debate, considering that the 1948 Leafs came out in 1949.

Quote:
Originally Posted by packs View Post
The 1949 Bowman set has a lot more rookies than I remembered too:

Campy
Early Wynn
Robin Roberts
Richie Ashburn
Duke Snider
Bob Lemon

And could break the tie at 6 if Hodges ever gets in.

Last edited by Chris Counts; 06-18-2021 at 04:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 06-18-2021, 05:02 PM
JollyElm's Avatar
JollyElm JollyElm is offline
D@rrΣn Hu.ghΣs
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Cardboard Land
Posts: 7,802
Default

What in high mother effin' heck is XRC??? The "RC" part has gotta be 'Rookie Card,' but 'X'??? Is this some sort of a modern collecting acronym???
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land

https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm

Looking to trade? Here's my bucket:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706

“I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.”
Casey Stengel

Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s.

Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 06-18-2021, 05:16 PM
HistoricNewspapers HistoricNewspapers is offline
Brian
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 185
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rats60 View Post
Who is your rookie in 1986? Agree to disagree on Puckett. It was the hobby and collectors not Beckett who decided that rookie cards had to be available to the majority of collectors and not regionals or limited releases like 1984 Fleer Update.

Unless Beckett asked every collector, then it is Beckett who made the final determination.

That premise established by Beckett is slowly being chipped away. 1984 Fleer Update Roger Clemens and Kirby Puckett are their rookie cards and are far more desirable cards than any of their 1985 cards. The fact they were harder to obtain makes it even appealing...not worse. As long as they are baseball cards, and not photos or something, how they were distributed (widespread or not) is meaning less and less in the eyes of many collectors. At this point, I prefer the regional and/or tougher issued cards. The 'traditional' counterparts get a little boring since there are so many of them in circulation.

The 'true rookie card' has always been a moving target and viewed differently by everyone and is a contrived notion much like the Holiday of Sweetest Day is...so it doesn't really matter at that point.

What it comes down to is if the 1984 Fleer Update is a better card than any of the 1985 issues. I say 100% yes they are. The fact they are more rare is a far more appealing factor than what Beckett says is a rookie card or not...but to each their own. Nobody will convince anyone who already has their mind made up on that topic anyway.

Last edited by HistoricNewspapers; 06-18-2021 at 05:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 06-18-2021, 07:24 PM
steve B steve B is offline
Steve Birmingham
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: eastern Mass.
Posts: 8,229
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JollyElm View Post
What in high mother effin' heck is XRC??? The "RC" part has gotta be 'Rookie Card,' but 'X'??? Is this some sort of a modern collecting acronym???
X for extended.... Some liked the update sets, and considered them the rookie cards. But then more dealers came along who were just dealers and didn't know cards and often didn't qualify to buy direct from Topps or any of the other companies. They complained (whined) that they couldn't just buy the update sets so they shouldn't count. And regionals shouldn't count, and ......

So Beckett settled on a sort of fake definition, which I've reworded somewhat cynically.

Rookie card- A card issued sort of near the year a player debuted in the league, and was also sold in quantities large enough that every dealer who wanted to could capitalize on the hype.

XRC - A card issued possibly in the players actual first year, but sold to actual businesses, not just guys working out of their garage and the local flea market. OR that were available to any dealer but most of them didn't think the player had potential/had their cash tied up in the football release and didn't buy any.

By 88 it was just silly. Score rookies counted, because there were a ton of them avialable through Toys r Us etc. I forget which year Topps started selling the update set in packs, so they counted after that, while companies that didn't still got the XRC designation.

Going by the logic of "it should only count if everyone could buy it" ...
75 minis were regional, so a 75 Brett is a RC while a 75 mini Brett shouldn't be.
Many areas were serviced by distributors that didn't buy the high numbers. So high numbers were in fact regional and shouldn't count. (but they do!)

To my mind, once the hobby progressed into a somewhat more major hobby the whole RC thing became stupid.
Old days, most kids only collected for 3-4 years, and only the big stars or favorite players survived the wrath of mom. So while Mantle got saved, that kid in Milwaukee (Aaron) probably didn't.
Say around 1977 and people bought hundreds of Joe Charboneau figuring he would become a big star. Since then at least nearly every rookie card has been hoarded and saved in huge qauntities. I would go so far as to say that 89UD Griffeys are more common than any other 89UD card.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 06-18-2021, 07:52 PM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is online now
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 32,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JustinD View Post
Here, here!

XRC is sham, 1985 Mcgwire is not an XRC and is not even a major league card...

The emperor has no clothes over there in their designations.

For me personally, I consider the first card issued in a major league uni the RC and agree fully that includes the Star sets, the 86' Fleer is years away from being a RC and easily the most overvalued and over hyped card in the hobby other than the 2nd year 1952 Mantle which is first place hands down.

I know that not everyone has the same thoughts nor do I expect them to. These are my thoughts and beliefs and I would personally never call either a rookie.
I would call McGwire a RC because it's in a Topps set, I don't care about the ML uniform thing.

Agreed on 101 vs 57.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg jordan101.jpg (75.1 KB, 199 views)
__________________
My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at
https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/

He is available to do custom drawings in graphite, charcoal and other media. He also sells some of his works as note cards/greeting cards on Etsy under JamesSpaethArt.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 06-18-2021, 08:11 PM
G1911 G1911 is online now
Gr.eg McCl.@y
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 7,117
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JustinD View Post
Here, here!

XRC is sham, 1985 Mcgwire is not an XRC and is not even a major league card...

The emperor has no clothes over there in their designations.

For me personally, I consider the first card issued in a major league uni the RC and agree fully that includes the Star sets, the 86' Fleer is years away from being a RC and easily the most overvalued and over hyped card in the hobby other than the 2nd year 1952 Mantle which is first place hands down.

I know that not everyone has the same thoughts nor do I expect them to. These are my thoughts and beliefs and I would personally never call either a rookie.

Amen.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 06-19-2021, 04:04 AM
seanofjapan's Avatar
seanofjapan seanofjapan is offline
Sean McGinty
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Japan
Posts: 517
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth View Post
1991 may never be topped:
Mussina
C. Jones
Thome
P. Martinez
Bagwell
I. Rodriguez

I think I only came up with one year where there were 5, 1957:
F Robinson
B. Robinson
Bunning
Drysdale
Mazeroski

But I may be missing something.

2018 has a lot of promising players, we'll see.
One thing that kind of puts me off on 1991, compared to earlier sets like 1957, is that there is no one set which has all those guys init. Like Topps is missing Mussina, Bowman is missing Pedro, UD is missing Thome, Fleer is missing almost everyone, etc.
__________________
My blog about collecting cards in Japan: https://baseballcardsinjapan.blogspot.jp/
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 06-19-2021, 08:50 AM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is online now
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 32,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by seanofjapan View Post
One thing that kind of puts me off on 1991, compared to earlier sets like 1957, is that there is no one set which has all those guys init. Like Topps is missing Mussina, Bowman is missing Pedro, UD is missing Thome, Fleer is missing almost everyone, etc.
Funny, to me that makes it that much better.
__________________
My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at
https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/

He is available to do custom drawings in graphite, charcoal and other media. He also sells some of his works as note cards/greeting cards on Etsy under JamesSpaethArt.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 06-19-2021, 09:39 AM
ALR-bishop ALR-bishop is offline
Al Richter
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 9,150
Default

For a player collector maybe, but not a set collector. On the other hand, if you are a set collector the RC debate does not matter as much

Last edited by ALR-bishop; 06-19-2021 at 10:41 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 06-19-2021, 09:56 AM
butchie_t butchie_t is offline
β∪τ∁ℏ †∪RΩεΓ
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Nevada
Posts: 1,336
Default

Then in 1982 Topps has Ripken in the regular set and the traded set. In my mind the three card rookie card is his actual rookie card but the traded card sure gets a lot of attention as being his rookie card.

Last edited by butchie_t; 06-19-2021 at 10:04 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 06-19-2021, 01:00 PM
HistoricNewspapers HistoricNewspapers is offline
Brian
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 185
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by butchie_t View Post
Then in 1982 Topps has Ripken in the regular set and the traded set. In my mind the three card rookie card is his actual rookie card but the traded card sure gets a lot of attention as being his rookie card.
Slightly different topic, but I actually prefer when a player has a rookie card that is shared with other players. To me, it captures the time when the player was not known or good enough to even have his own card...capturing the essence of what it means to be the 'rookie'....sort of a baseball card hazing of a rookie .

I love that aspect of the Pete Rose rookie card...and that card takes it even further by not even giving him a neck in the photo, lol.

The 82 Topps Traded clearly came after the three player card. Some like the Traded card because of the opposite of what I said above. It is also less plentiful, and that probably accounts for it being more valuable.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 06-19-2021, 01:35 PM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is online now
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 32,057
Default

In 1962 Gaylord Perry had his own rookie card. In 1963 he shared a card with three other players.
__________________
My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at
https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/

He is available to do custom drawings in graphite, charcoal and other media. He also sells some of his works as note cards/greeting cards on Etsy under JamesSpaethArt.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 06-19-2021, 01:49 PM
HistoricNewspapers HistoricNewspapers is offline
Brian
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 185
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth View Post
In 1962 Gaylord Perry had his own rookie card. In 1963 he shared a card with three other players.
Yes indeed. Then some guys get two years being on a multi-player rookie card like Dale Murphy.

Off topic, but I hope Murphy is the one guy from the 80's that gets HOF nod from the veterans committee at some point.

It is funny how the HOF criteria of "character and sportsmanship" is used against candidates for enshrinement, but never used FOR enshrinement. Maybe it is time to change that and put that criteria to positive use and apply it to Murphy to put him over the top.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 06-19-2021, 02:32 PM
ALR-bishop ALR-bishop is offline
Al Richter
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 9,150
Default

Bill Davis was on a Topps Rookie card in 1966, 1967, 1968 and 1969 ( all multi players)

Lou Piniella appeared on Topps Rookie cards in 1964, 1968, 1969 ( multi players) and 1970 ( stand alone Rookie Award)
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 06-19-2021, 05:47 PM
mikemb mikemb is offline
Mike Lenart
Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Garwood, NJ
Posts: 427
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ALR-bishop View Post
Bill Davis was on a Topps Rookie card in 1966, 1967, 1968 and 1969 ( all multi players)

Lou Piniella appeared on Topps Rookie cards in 1964, 1968, 1969 ( multi players) and 1970 ( stand alone Rookie Award)
Wasn't Bill Davis on 5 cards? He was also in the 1965 Topps set, #546.

Dick Simpson was on a rookie card 4 times: 1963, 1964, 1965 and 1966.

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 06-19-2021, 10:48 PM
JollyElm's Avatar
JollyElm JollyElm is offline
D@rrΣn Hu.ghΣs
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Cardboard Land
Posts: 7,802
Default

Another pertinent excerpt from my 'New Collectorisms' thread...

59. Small Photatoes
Players who are so easily forgotten about that they appear on rookie cards in multiple years.

See also: Knucklestaller - the person at Topps who decided Gaylord Perry should appear on a multi-player rookie card the year after he had his own ‘regular’ card.
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land

https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm

Looking to trade? Here's my bucket:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706

“I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.”
Casey Stengel

Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s.

Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 06-20-2021, 08:49 AM
bb66 bb66 is offline
member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: SE Tennessee
Posts: 117
Default

How many HOF players have appeared on more than one Rookie Stars card(2 or more players on a card). I can think of Niekro quickly not sure how many more.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 06-20-2021, 09:31 AM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is online now
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 32,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikemb View Post
Wasn't Bill Davis on 5 cards? He was also in the 1965 Topps set, #546.

Dick Simpson was on a rookie card 4 times: 1963, 1964, 1965 and 1966.

Mike
Al used to be infallible.
__________________
My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at
https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/

He is available to do custom drawings in graphite, charcoal and other media. He also sells some of his works as note cards/greeting cards on Etsy under JamesSpaethArt.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 06-20-2021, 09:33 AM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is online now
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 32,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bb66 View Post
How many HOF players have appeared on more than one Rookie Stars card(2 or more players on a card). I can think of Niekro quickly not sure how many more.
If he ever gets in, Tony Oliva.
__________________
My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at
https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/

He is available to do custom drawings in graphite, charcoal and other media. He also sells some of his works as note cards/greeting cards on Etsy under JamesSpaethArt.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 06-20-2021, 11:03 AM
HistoricNewspapers HistoricNewspapers is offline
Brian
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 185
Default

1978 Topps can get up to five HOF rookies with Lou Whitaker getting a lot of support.

Same for 1975 Topps with Keith Hernandez getting a lot of support.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
T206 Graded Population Growth from year to year Farm_kid Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 5 04-22-2020 06:25 PM
1958 LA Dodgers Year Book - First year in CA. jerrys Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T 0 01-13-2020 09:19 PM
Best Year for set collectors/ Worst year darkhorse9 Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 7 03-05-2018 03:22 PM
Examples of HOF card earlier year cheaper than a later year card? 1952boyntoncollector Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk 7 07-11-2016 12:18 PM
HOF Best First Year/Last Year Rookie Cards Topps jb67 Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 5 03-28-2016 10:41 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:41 PM.


ebay GSB