PWCC Huigens Now Has a Criminal Defense Attorney

[Snapolit1]

Originally Posted by bnorth

I am sure Mr Lichtman will do what is best for the hobby and his client who was obviously used by less than honest card doctors.

He has one client. And no obligation to do anything for the hobby.

[CMIZ5290]

Originally Posted by Snapolit1

He has one client. And no obligation to do anything for the hobby.

Integrity, dignity, and hypocrisy be damned!

[CMIZ5290]

I wonder if Jeff would represent Joe Orlando down the line?

[conor912]

Originally Posted by CMIZ5290

Integrity, dignity, and hypocrisy be damned!

A big kudos to him for reaffirming the punchline of every lawyer joke every written.

[Snapolit1]

Originally Posted by CMIZ5290

Integrity, dignity, and hypocrisy be damned!

It’s kind of how the lawyer thing works. I don’t think you’d want your lawyer to have some alternative agenda other that getting you the best defense possible.

[Republicaninmass]

Lots of people punching WELL above their weight these days.

[Moonlight Graham]

Seems to me Brent screwed a lot of people for a lot of money. I think it's kind of cool that a fellow board member is now going to take a lot of money from him.

Joe Kemmett

[hcv123]

I do not know Jeff personally, but have read many of his posts here. He has been a champion of the hobby. I believe if Brent was represented by a different attorney, he very well could have been advised to take different actions than refunding those who have purchased doctored cards. I presume Jeff thought about and is walking a bit of a fine line here. Facilitating both what is in his clients best legal interest while helping some people get restitution. I trust his practice and intention here.

[Johnny630]

I wonder who else is giving money to this victims restitution fund ?

Who is funding all the refunds ? Does PWCC have enough bread in their vault to cover the bad card ? Is PSA saying the cards are altered when returned to PWCC or is PWCC making that call ?

Is PSA be investigated ? I’m not taking up for anyone but geez how can PSA not be held somewhat responsible/..not criminally responsible but liable for negligence in grading thousand of these bad cards. That Cap Anson Peter previously posted from Blowout was Awful....originally Slabbed by PSA as Altered in MH then later a PSA 4 in PWCC ....idk it’s very depressing...more ugly cards each day discover by BO Detectives who along with Peter have done a great service.

When all litigation is over and adjudication rendered, will the bad cards in government evidence be returned to PSA to be removed from the Pop Report? if and when PSA deems them as altered ?

[vintagetoppsguy]

Originally Posted by hcv123

I do not know Jeff personally, but have read many of his posts here. He has been a champion of the hobby. I believe if Brent was represented by a different attorney, he very well could have been advised to take different actions than refunding those who have purchased doctored cards. I presume Jeff thought about and is walking a bit of a fine line here. Facilitating both what is in his clients best legal interest while helping some people get restitution. I trust his practice and intention here.

Client's best interest? Restitution? Jeff really has you guys fooled. Y'all are so gullible.

You think Jeff gives a shit about his client's best interest? He was hooking up with his girlfriend during El Chapo's trial. Was that in his client's best interest?

https://www.foxnews.com/us/el-chapos...-client-report

If you really think Jeff gives a shit about restitution? Tell me what kind of restitution did El Chapo's victims get? Should I post some extremely graphic images as a reminder?

Please! What a crock of shit!

[1952boyntoncollector]

Originally Posted by hcv123

I do not know Jeff personally, but have read many of his posts here. He has been a champion of the hobby. I believe if Brent was represented by a different attorney, he very well could have been advised to take different actions than refunding those who have purchased doctored cards. I presume Jeff thought about and is walking a bit of a fine line here. Facilitating both what is in his clients best legal interest while helping some people get restitution. I trust his practice and intention here.

I think you have to take with a grain of salt anything a lawyer says about what their clients intention is etc... If another lawyer was worried about the hobby more than the client it would be a conflict of interest to the client

[Fuddjcal]

Originally Posted by Moonlight Graham

Seems to me Brent screwed a lot of people for a lot of money. I think it's kind of cool that a fellow board member is now going to take a lot of money from him.

Joe Kemmett

Me too