PWCC's 1936 Goudey World Wide Gum DiMaggio PSA 7

[vintagetoppsguy]

Originally Posted by Whodunit

This makes the 4th time ive shown this David (vintagetoppsguy). What part of this confuses you?

You can show me your BS texts all you want. The fact is you're saying 2 different things. You first said that you were bidding to win it back for your collection, then you say you were bidding because you were asked to shill. You're a proven liar.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy

You can show me your BS texts all you want. The fact is you're saying 2 different things. You first said that you were bidding to win it back for your collection, then you say you were bidding because you were asked to shill. You're a proven liar.

I think it all fits, if I am understanding it. He initially bid to win, bidding in increments. He stopped short of taking the lead position. He then decided not to bid any more having learned of the card's history. PWCC then asked him to bid again to take the top slot, saying it looked bad that he had stopped short.

[PhillipAbbott79]

Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy

You can show me your BS texts all you want. The fact is you're saying 2 different things. You first said that you were bidding to win it back for your collection, then you say you were bidding because you were asked to shill. You're a proven liar.

Offense now meant. You are an idiot.

[vintagetoppsguy]

Originally Posted by PhillipAbbott79

Offense now meant. You are an idiot.

What a dumbass.

[PhillipAbbott79]

Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy

What a dumbass.

You are the only one who does not seem to get it. Do you have a reading comprehension issue or something?

[vintagetoppsguy]

Originally Posted by PhillipAbbott79

You are the only one who does not seem to get it. Do you have a reading comprehension issue or something?

No dumbass. I understand it quite well. Cortney initially said that he bid on the card for his own collection. Then he said he bid on it because he was asked to shill. Two conflicting statements.

[1952boyntoncollector]

Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy

No dumbass. I understand it quite well. Cortney initially said that he bid on the card for his own collection. Then he said he bid on it because he was asked to shill. Two conflicting statements.

Peter said

"I think it all fits, if I am understanding it. He initially bid to win, bidding in increments. He stopped short of taking the lead position. He then decided not to bid any more having learned of the card's history. PWCC then asked him to bid again to take the top slot, saying it looked bad that he had stopped short. "

that would not conflict

[PhillipAbbott79]

Originally Posted by 1952boyntoncollector

Peter said

"I think it all fits, if I am understanding it. He initially bid to win, bidding in increments. He stopped short of taking the lead position. He then decided not to bid any more having learned of the card's history. PWCC then asked him to bid again to take the top slot, saying it looked bad that he had stopped short. "

that would not conflict

Good lord. It is not your responsibility to correct him post after moronic post. Just let him soak in the stupidity and move on.

[Whodunit]

Phillipabbot, how do you argue with that level of stupid from david? He cant comprehend bidding to win, finding out it was dr'd, stopping bidding for0 that reason and then being asked to top the bid and "i assure you that you will be outbid". I tried to fill him in on timestamps, but even that didnt help. My guess is he hit his head extremely hard on a truck moving in excess of 60mph.

Im working on exporting the rest of the conversation, but what is dated the 8th was essentially the last time i texted him.......asking for the 60k inv (of which i still have not received).....trigger....betsy.

What is prior to the shots ive shown tonight go much deeper than the dimaggio. My guess is that not only will they be shown here, they will be subpoenaed in court as my attorneys have already done so for my phone (same # for 17 yrs).

As for multiple ebay ids, i have 2 accts and my wife has one. I use all 3 accts in an effort to keep people from knowing what all im bidding on. Evay id letters are easy to follow, which is why many of us have multiple accts and change ids monthly.......it keeps the investigators in the hobby off our scent. It's hardly a new idea or frowned upon idea. Both of my accts are linked to one paypal acct and all you need is a new email to set up as many accts as you want.

Again, this is not about losing 25-30k on a card; that's happened many times, it's about being lied to and fraud. If i didnt have my tracks covered 110%, with all ive thrown at brent today, id have kept my mouth shut for legal reasons. However, he's in for the fight of his life, he just hasnt been "served"......yet.

That said, watch out brent. ;-)

[Kenny Cole]

IMO, this thread is very disappointing and disheartening to those of us who simply want to buy the cards we are interested in without paying too much or thinking we got shilled. That is true at any level of the purchase, Too bad. I personally think both parties suck and have zero respect for both.

[1952boyntoncollector]

Originally Posted by Whodunit

ph.

Im working on exporting the rest of the conversation, but what is dated the 8th was essentially the last time i texted him.......asking for the 60k inv (of which i still have not received).....trigger....betsy.
.

-)

Just to clear this portion, IF you got an invoice for 60k, would you be paying it? (You keep saying you have not received it yet and some may think that is why you may not have paid)

[PhillipAbbott79]

Originally Posted by Whodunit

Im working on exporting the rest of the conversation, but what is dated the 8th was essentially the last time i texted him.......asking for the 60k inv (of which i still have not received).....trigger....betsy.

Please see my post about how to try and export the entire conversation located here, post 482:

http://www.net54baseball.com/showthr...53#post1631953