![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I dont understand this guy's response if he believes they are real. If he mentioned an attorney, it is juvenile at best. The obsession people have with mention of an attorney when someone gets upset is ludicrous. It undermines them in such inappropriate times, and means their word means nothing to me.
__________________
Be ethical at all times. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Saying that from my previous post, I think there are serious issues with the latest 1923 Willard's Ruth that rdixon posted the link to. First the borders look too wide, and also the corners look to well rounded. When I see something like that, it screams fake to me. And when one item in the lot is fake, it makes me very skeptical of the rest, especially if they are all top tier HOF'ers and no similar looking commons.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Gary,
I really don't think the Ruth is a reprint. There are definitely examples out there with top and bottom borders sized that way and other examples have rough cuts on the right and left edges as if they've been removed from a strip of cards. It seems to me that the card in question had some staining near the corners which was removed with a solvent, causing some damage to that area. Then, someone just trimmed the damaged areas so that the corners were rounded. It was a crude process but that's what I see when I look at it. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Last edited by glchen; 06-08-2015 at 01:16 AM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Even though they look a bit off I am now leaning towards them being good with issues, as Michael stated. And 3 of them are listed again....(I have seen solvent or chemicals make cards look bad previously, as many here have)
http://www.ebay.com/sch/prdaniel62/m...p2047675.l2562 .
__________________
Leon Luckey |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have no idea if they are good or not but if I was the seller and had all this drama surrounding the cards, I would bite the bullet and get them graded. In this case it would likely assure a higher price realized even only graded as auth.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NEW PRICE: 1924 Willards Babe Ruth SGC 5.5! CLOSED | jcgage0 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 12-13-2011 07:40 AM |
NEW PRICE: 1924 Willards Babe Ruth SGC 5.5! CLOSED | jcgage0 | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, W, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 12-05-2011 03:47 PM |
1924 Willards Babe Ruth SGC 5.5! Only 2 graded higher by SGC! | HRBAKER | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 11-27-2011 11:32 AM |
willards chocolates ty cobb comparison | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 01-07-2008 08:37 AM |
ty cobb willards chocolate ?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 02-18-2007 05:41 PM |