What's up with Mears???

[mickeymao34]

Originally Posted by mickeymao34

who is Mears trying to kid with this supposed photomatch of MJ 97-98 Finals "non" worn jersey???..supported imagery analysis NOT even close.. a few areas ,, BIG deal.. doesn't mean jack

some poor dude already bidding on it ,,ugh

[ruth-gehrig]

I was curious when i heard the term "imagery analysis". I dont collect jerseys but I've always seen the term "photo matched".

[AustinMike]

Originally Posted by ruth-gehrig

I was curious when i heard the term "imagery analysis". I dont collect jerseys but I've always seen the term "photo matched".

I think it's a typo. It should be "imaginary analysis."

[thecatspajamas]

Not weighing in on the accuracy of the analysis/match, but perhaps "imagery analysis" was used where a comparison to video footage was used, as opposed to a "photo match" which would imply that a comparison to, well, a photo was used?

Also, shouldn't mickeymao have his name under his post?

[mickeymao34]

Originally Posted by thecatspajamas

Not weighing in on the accuracy of the analysis/match, but perhaps "imagery analysis" was used where a comparison to video footage was used, as opposed to a "photo match" which would imply that a comparison to, well, a photo was used?

Also, shouldn't mickeymao have his name under his post?

video vs photo whats the difference they are inferring its a videomatch or photomatch...same thing. and ive edited initial post with my name
Mike Louie

[mickeymao34]

Originally Posted by ruth-gehrig

I was curious when i heard the term "imagery analysis". I dont collect jerseys but I've always seen the term "photo matched".

notice how they cropped area that has some matching mesh holes? will this certainly not a photomatched..but they want u to think that