T213-1 = t206?

[rhettyeakley]

I voted yes, but don't really want to see it happen unless a major overhaul is done. IMO the Coupons "should" have been classified as T206 cards but since they weren't I don't really want to see that sole monumental change occurring.

I think the entire ACC should be an ongoing project with items being added to the ongoing lists until there is nothing left to add! No other hobby is beholden to a 75 year old cataloging system that hasn't had but a few additions over the years. We seem to be content calling cards E-Uncat. or T-Uncat forever, even though the item has been a known entity for 50+ years. In order to do that there would need to be some concensus and a "central body" that would be responsible for it, even Burdick was on board as he purposely left gaps in places for new ACC numbers to be added in.

[tedzan]

If they Quack like a Duck....Waddle like a Duck....Look like a Duck....then they are indeed a T206. Well, most of you know where I stand on this subject from my
1910 Coupon threads of several years ago on this forum.

Having said all that.......I essentially agree with Rhett......I don't expect that a change will ever be made. Nor, do I care.

In my mind, the 1910 "COUPON" cards are T206's; and, I have arranged the twelve T213-1 cards I have in with the 350-only Series cards of my T206 (hybrid) set.





....

..





T-Rex TED
.

[Bocabirdman]

Originally Posted by tedzan

If they Quack like a Duck....Waddle like a Duck....Look like a Duck....then they are indeed a T206.
.

If you look at my avatar you will notice that my Waddell is Quacked, perhaps because he didn't Duck?

[ValKehl]

Originally Posted by rhettyeakley

...I think the entire ACC should be an ongoing project with items being added to the ongoing lists until there is nothing left to add! No other hobby is beholden to a 75 year old cataloging system that hasn't had but a few additions over the years. We seem to be content calling cards E-Uncat. or T-Uncat forever, even though the item has been a known entity for 50+ years. In order to do that there would need to be some concensus and a "central body" that would be responsible for it, even Burdick was on board as he purposely left gaps in places for new ACC numbers to be added in.

+1

[t206blogcom]

Not T206.

[jp1216]

A great topic that has been debated for quite some time. Polling results show a pretty even split so far - as expected. I agree that the ACC should be an on going project and not law, but not sure (especially with 50/50 polling) that a change would ever be warranted. I own one T213-1 and include it in my T206 box. I lean to the 'should be included' group.

[baztacula]

Is this the most divisive question in the history of the hobby? 70+ votes in and we are split down the middle. Wise politicians should definitely avoid the topic in the next election.

[edhans]

Originally Posted by rhettyeakley

I voted yes, but don't really want to see it happen unless a major overhaul is done. IMO the Coupons "should" have been classified as T206 cards but since they weren't I don't really want to see that sole monumental change occurring.

I think the entire ACC should be an ongoing project with items being added to the ongoing lists until there is nothing left to add! No other hobby is beholden to a 75 year old cataloging system that hasn't had but a few additions over the years. We seem to be content calling cards E-Uncat. or T-Uncat forever, even though the item has been a known entity for 50+ years. In order to do that there would need to be some concensus and a "central body" that would be responsible for it, even Burdick was on board as he purposely left gaps in places for new ACC numbers to be added in.

+2