 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
08-22-2013, 05:56 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Founding fathers understood
Thus the ACC designation of 90 coming before 102....
It was known that a caramel issue was made in 1908 but for some reasons the TPG ignored the (correct) ACC designation and placed their own (incorrect) dates on the slabs.... 
|
|
#3
08-22-2013, 07:58 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Based on the team rosters printed on the back of the E91-A, these cards were was issued circa Summer 1908.
Based on several trades of players in the 1st series of the E90-1 set, this series was issued circa Winter of 1908. The Cy Young (Boston AL) is certainly evidence of this 1908 date. TED Z
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The evidence against Barry Halper is mounting | slidekellyslide | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 63 | 01-18-2011 07:41 AM |
| Evidence of trimming | kylebicking | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 02-04-2010 04:03 PM |
| Leon, I will post evidence this evening | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 05-01-2008 10:47 PM |
| The Evidence as Promised | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 05-01-2008 07:02 PM |
| evidence of trimming vs. cut short | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 04-08-2005 04:18 PM |
Hybrid Mode
