![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Matt
If a board member won this, I'd be interested to know how the story ends. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Kyle
I was hoping too that the winner is on the board. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Michael C
a $3000 gamble. Can these be soaked? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dstudeba
There is 1 D311 (Danzig), the other is a T212. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: peter ullman
I only see 1 d311 there...in super nice shape. And I doubt these are t216's as the print clarity isn't indicative. I'd guess e102's...if we'll ever find out. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Rhys
I live here in Boise where these cards are located and almost asked to go see the cards in person but I knew ultimately it did not matter what I saw, I would be outbid so I did not waste the sellers time. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Matt
Peter - the Cobb could be E92 (non-Dockman), E101, E102, E105 but I agree, that the print looks to be too nice for any Cobb issue post 1911 that has that pose. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Kyle
I am such an amateur when it comes to ID'ing certain issues. Thanks for the clarification. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
I think the Cobby and Zimmerman might be E101's due to the very large bottom borders. Too big of a gamble for me right now, not knowing what they are pasted on with. I hope someone will come forth and let us know how it turns out. regards |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dstudeba
Yes Matt, and when it got made. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mike Mccullough
I was hoping to pick this lot up but my sniper wasnt set high enough.. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ed Hans
Dan and Matt, |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Marty Ogelvie
It would be fascinating to see it up close and in person. Were all assuming the buyer is looking to free these cards from their keepsake, which is a risky proposition at best.. fingers crossed it all turns out OK! |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dstudeba
Yes Ed, just a strange assortment of cards. I have seen scrapbooks from that era with black construction paper, but where is the rest of the book? Plus the papar looks in great shape. I was more worried that a person had 8 cards that looked like the one below and decided to increase their value. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dan Koteles
The Cobb looked fine, but a couple of the other cards looked abit small. The puchaser did well for the Cobb card alone depending on/if back damage is present. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Alan U
"where is the rest of the book?" |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dstudeba
Thanks Alan, I missed that one too. Why didn't anyone post about it before the auction ended? It was in the right category so obviously everyone saw it. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Rhys
The other thing that lends to the theory that these were put in the book later is that the same seller also sold some 1920 Rose Bowl team Postcards of the Harvard and Oregon teams glued to the same black scrapbook paper. These were obviously not done until after 1920 so the baseball cards were glued after that date it would seem and probably even later. She did mention in the first auction (linked above) however that one of the cards had sort of popped off and you could see dried up glue on the corners. Hopefully that did not mean dried up rubber cement. Either way, the Stain Guy could probably fix them up. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: peter ullman
I thought I saw some 20's era original bb photos pasted in a similar manner sold by the same seller. Personally I think this piece is legit and close to period. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Rhys
I dont think anyone is doubting the authenticity of the cards or the paper used to adhere them etc. However, there can be a big difference between glue in 1910 and glue in the 1940's and that might make a huge difference when trying to free these cards. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ed Hans
Peter, |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
New to the site and found this. Here'e the results....the two T206 cards were old mills with no damage. One Obak with initials on the back. Three E102's..Zimmerman & Klienow had paper loss previously before being remounted. The cobb looked great but there was a small piece of the border missing on the front left (as if it stuck to the page ahead in the book). Otherwise EXMT....the D311 danzig is NM+. Sent out or grading and will have results back by Friday.
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() Last edited by Matt; 05-06-2009 at 11:10 AM. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Danzig - EXMT SGC 80
Cobb - VGEX SGC 50 (if it wasnt for that tiny tear on front...looking at EXMT) |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Nice results. Congrats.
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Ed
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
t 227 / cobb /sgc 40 / with original honest long cut pack | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 02-16-2009 02:21 PM |
T227 lot on ebay Cobb and Bender, WG6 Wagner, Caramels | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 04-04-2008 10:03 AM |
Johnson - I don't mind showing mine | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 10-21-2006 08:19 PM |
Ty Cobb card showing split grip | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 01-02-2006 02:54 PM |
The CJ stars are showing up everywhere! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 03-03-2002 08:36 AM |