![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Glen V
How do people feel about marking their scans before posting? Some people put text on their scans to identify the owner/company, but not many people seem to do it. It seems like a good idea - keep scammers from selling cards they don't own - but it does take extra work to edit and re-save each scan. Why do or don't you do it? Does it bother you when scans are marked? Other views? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T206 Old Mill "Single Factory Overprint" & Cobb "Red Hindu" & "Uzit | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 04-14-2009 06:28 PM |
Beware ebay seller "justizzle3". Our scans got stolen. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 42 | 02-06-2006 06:52 PM |
John "Rowdy Jack" Joseph "Peach Pie" O'Connor ?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 10-17-2005 11:58 AM |
Does a PSA grade of "miscut" or "cut too small" mean that the card is authentic? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 03-30-2005 01:23 PM |
"t206 Origins" page is up - any scans are very welcome | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 04-14-2002 07:33 AM |