 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
04-26-2007, 08:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Disturbing: "High-tech doctoring"/ "restoration"
Posted By: Ed
"High-tech doctoring" is someone else's words on a recent thread. Is it a waste of money to pursue pristine examples, if the major grading companies accept "restored" cards? At what point does restoration become alteration? I see this as a serious threat to the hobby. In my mind, baseball card "restoration" obviously threatens condition rarity and pop reports, which I see as a major motivational component of our hobby. Will the grading companies wake up to this and find ways to spot restoration/alteration? 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1929 R316 "Kashin Publications" Babe Ruth with "MADE IN U.S.A" | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 08-06-2022 02:27 PM |
| T206 Old Mill "Single Factory Overprint" & Cobb "Red Hindu" & "Uzit | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 04-14-2009 06:28 PM |
| John "Rowdy Jack" Joseph "Peach Pie" O'Connor ?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 10-17-2005 11:58 AM |
| Does a PSA grade of "miscut" or "cut too small" mean that the card is authentic? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 03-30-2005 01:23 PM |
| "Grade Tech" let off too easy~ | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 08-18-2002 12:51 AM |
Threaded Mode