![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dave
After picking one of these up yesterday, been trying to read up on them a little today. Just how rare are these? How many do you own? Have you owned? And in general what condition??? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
They are pretty tough. If you go to Pete Calderon's site, only e104s and e107s are considered tougher. Thy are usually found with a crease in the center runnig top to bottom. I was lucky enough to have bought a number of them that were crease free a find Mark Macrae made around 1989 or 1990. I bought a Young, Lajoie, Knight and Bescher. All would have graded 5 or higher. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Gilbert Maines
One relative rarity list places e105 at 1.3% of the total e-card population. For comparison, this list has e107s and e104s at 0.9%. And e99 & e100 at 0.2%. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
Gil, where did these numbers come from? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Gilbert Maines
Jay, I calculated those values from data tabulated by BOTN on actual eBay sales of e-cards over a nominal 18 month span. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
That's not the most reliable way to determine scaricity. A lot of sales are driven by whatever is the flavor of the moment. E107s have hot a few years now, so we've seen a lot more come to market becuase of the prices they have generated. With the recent auction of e104s, I won't be surprised to see more of them come to market either. The prices realized have certainly got thinking about unlaoding mine. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Gilbert Maines
Unfortunately Jay, I do not usually have the luxury of being able to do things the most reliable way. In this instance I came upon a significant amount of data, evaluated it for apparent accuracy and completeness, and chose to use it for my own purposes (and today - to offer asphaltman some insight that he was seeking). |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
I'm not questioning your calculations or the accuracy of the numbers collected. I'm just questioning the validity of the numbers relative to the actual population. My experience from teh 80s doesn't bear out the data presented. My experience is much closer to what is presented on Pete's site. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Gilbert Maines
Well that would be interesting, I will have to check out pete's site. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: BcD
including this: |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Gilbert Maines
I do not see a disagreement Jay. Pete employs general terms to characterize rarity, such as very difficult, extremely difficult, etc. for each e-card subdivision, and with very few divergences the calculated values which I have from a sample of about 2500 individual sales, mirror his descriptions. Maybe you are seeing something that I am missing. I have added my calculated percentages of the total e-card population to his descriptive terms below. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dave
is there any book value listed anywhere for these e-105's? not graded, but just a standard value for the cards in varying condition online?? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: S Gross
Old Cardboard list them at $150 vg. Which I think is a bit low, since if I saw an e105 vg at $150, I'd jump at it. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
I have never seen Peter Calderon's site. Can someone post a link? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Andrew
Pete's site: www.caramel-cards.com |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: mike mullins
Gilbert, |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|