 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
11-02-2020, 04:12 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Koufax RC - What will it grade?
Looking for your "expert" opinions on this if I send to PSA. Thanks
__________________
Lonnie Nagel T206 : 212/520 : 40.6% 
|
|
#2
11-02-2020, 04:39 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Beautiful Sandy!!! Are there any unseen issues, like bends, wrinkles or such? The black print line across his forehead is the only 'bad' thing that jumps out. The corners seem pretty nice and the centering is absolutely stellar. At a very minimum, it looks like a 6 or 7 any day of the week, but whenever someone guesses a grade, they're usually way off, so who knows? Just an awesome, legendary card!!!!!
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land  https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. 
|
|
#3
11-02-2020, 04:42 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Nope - No other defects, wrinkles, dinks or dents
Print Spots on forheaed only thing I can see I was thinking "7" but I'm usually wrong also
__________________
Lonnie Nagel T206 : 212/520 : 40.6% Last edited by toledo_mudhen; 11-02-2020 at 04:43 AM.
|
|
#4
11-02-2020, 05:07 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I am thinking '5', with a '6' possible. No higher. The print line going across kills it from getting anything higher.
|
|
#5
11-02-2020, 05:09 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yeah, I remember a fresh pack break posted on the CU/PSA board a few years ago, and the Clemente with a similar print line got a six. Can't see it higher than that.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes.
|
|
#6
11-02-2020, 05:30 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I agree with most here, probably a 6. Nice card though!!
__________________
Successful transactions with: Double-P-Enterprises, Thromdog, DavidBvintage, Desert Ice Sports, Kurtz Kardz, Cooperstown Sportscards, BBT206 and tenorvox!
|
|
#7
11-02-2020, 05:51 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ahhh...the voices of reason!
You guys are probably correct - I did too much reading this AM on the interwebs and came across this on PSA Standards. A PSA NM 7 is a card with just a slight surface wear visible upon close inspection. There may be slight fraying on some corners. Picture focus may be slightly out-of-register. A minor printing blemish is acceptable and then started thinking MAYBE?
__________________
Lonnie Nagel T206 : 212/520 : 40.6%
|
|
#8
11-02-2020, 06:25 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
6.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets.
|
|
#9
11-02-2020, 04:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Agree with 6.
|
|
#13
11-02-2020, 07:44 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I was going to say if I submitted it, a PSA 5.5. But who knows.
|
|
#15
11-03-2020, 03:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think the centering and bright color offsets the print line...I say 7.
__________________
Successful B/S/T deals with asoriano, obcbobd, x2dRich2000, eyecollectvintage, RepublicaninMass, Kwikford, Oneofthree67, jfkheat, scottglevy, whitehse, GoldenAge50s, Peter Spaeth, Northviewcats, megalimey, BenitoMcNamara, Edwolf1963, mightyq, sidepocket, darwinbulldog, jasonc, jessejames, sb1, rjackson44, bobbyw8469, quinnsryche, Carter08, philliesfan and ALBB, Buythatcard and JimmyC so far.
|
|
#16
11-04-2020, 12:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I've seen cards with print lines that graded 7s. Here is a PSA 8.
|
|
#17
11-05-2020, 02:12 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Old-school PSA flip on that Mantle-Boyer. In today's environment I think you get a 5 PD or a 4.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not...
|
|
#18
11-05-2020, 02:14 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Nah, that's way too harsh. Card looks like an 8 otherwise. So 8(PD) isn't out of the realm.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes.
|
|
#19
11-05-2020, 06:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| LTB Koufax low grade | gustomania | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 01-21-2020 10:06 AM |
| High end koufax RC or low grade Ruth | maximus35 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 11-09-2018 11:49 PM |
| 1955 Koufax RC High Grade | ezez420 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 4 | 02-02-2016 04:36 AM |
| WTB low grade Koufax rookie | epike3 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-31-2016 08:45 PM |
| 1960 Sandy Koufax Grade? | slidekellyslide | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 06-07-2010 05:44 PM |
Linear Mode
