![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just completed my 1966 set and got a little worn out from the high numbers and SPs. I have already completed 1965 and 1968. I have decided to take an easier route on my next set and am currently deciding between 1964 and 1969.
I already have a few 1964s (about 72) but seem to see 1969 cards a little more frequently available at low prices in higher grade condition. Are there any factors to consider that may not be readily apparent? I have read reviews that both are generally considered easy to assemble. I have attached a few pictures of the 1966 for viewing. Last edited by sfh24; 11-18-2018 at 06:43 PM. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
REA catalog lot - starting bid $5 | gawaintheknight | Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. | 3 | 07-23-2017 07:58 PM |
wanted to buy--I am starting a RAW (can you believe it) g-vg set- | forazzurri2axz | T206 cards B/S/T | 3 | 08-20-2016 08:21 PM |
Starting to wonder. . . . . | Snapolit1 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 02-23-2016 02:42 PM |
Looking for singles (starting a set) in 4, 5, and 6 | Sean1125 | T206 cards B/S/T | 4 | 03-29-2015 07:16 PM |
TOO STUFFY HERE - YOU WIN - STARTING MY OWN!! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 33 | 12-11-2003 06:17 PM |