![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
3D,wiffleball,test sets...anything goes.
Scott |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I
Finding high quality 71s. It is a mainstream set but tough to get nice ungraded copies. Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
71 Kellogg's with all its variations.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
71 OPC, Semi and Hi #s specifically. 74 OPC is scarce too.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Topps 70 Cloth
Topps 71 Rookie Artists Proofs Topps 1971 Winners Topps 1971 Greatest Moments Topps 1972 Candy Lids Topps 1973 Comics Topps 1973 Pin Ups Topps 1974 Puzzles Topps 1974 Deckle Topps 1978 Zest Soap...only kidding Topps 1980 TestCoins Last edited by ALR-bishop; 08-20-2016 at 07:52 PM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
As just a base Topps set collector, 71 and 72 were tough due to just the sheer volume. Both are near 800 cards each and those semi highs and highs in ex or better add up. I almost have a VG set of 71's with all the upgrades I've had to do after all the lots I bought and dug through.
Al...that list looks daunting. I'll leave those sets to the experts... ![]()
__________________
John Otto 1963 Fleer - 1981-90 Fleer/Donruss/Score/Leaf Complete 1953 - 1990 Topps/Bowman Complete 1953-55 Dormand SGC COMPLETE SGC AVG Score - 4.03 1953 Bowman Color - 122/160 76% |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Z |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
For Topps you have to differentiate between the sets that never made it out to retail and those that did. Two different animals to my mind. 71 Greatest Moments would be a retail set while the 71 Rookie All Stars are actually one of a kind pieces made for a special event. Something like the 1980 coins would be in house mock ups or proofs with only a small handful of each produced. The RAS and Coins were never meant for public consumption. As for the 53 Reprints, DIschley may or may not have suspect info but they were clearly produced in quantities around that of a test issue. I still think a luncheon or testimonial dinner would cover them and like to think maybe they were made for Woody Gelman's retirement dinner (j/k)......he may have crayoned this player notation on the back of my Furillo though, as it's close to his style of handwriting (neater than normal). No clue where the pencilled Pee Wee came from (click the link to see): http://toppsarchives.blogspot.com/search/label/1972%20%2753%20Topps%20Reprint
I've seen the other errors with a crayoned back as well but don't have scans. Last edited by toppcat; 09-03-2016 at 03:50 PM. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This would indeed be tough. From my experience putting the Lou Brock collection together, here would be some tough but I suppose doable 70's sets
70 Dayton Daily news with variations - tough MSA Customized, MSA Red Barn (both variations), MSA Cup lids - tough 78 Sportcaster with all the printing variations and all the obscure sports - tough |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Garvey tips that came on raisin bran aren't exactly easy. Not sure they'd be on the list as the toughest.
http://postcerealbaseballcardmuseum....rvey-tips.html The 1979 Red Sox set that was sold outside the park is pretty tough too. I don't know if the standard catalog ever ended up listing the "high numbers" A few cards added on to the set with the late season call ups. Sold as sets in a paper wrapper. http://www.ebay.com/itm/Mike-Torrez-...AAAOxyThVTYuZL 76 Hostess yellow and green. Different colors, some reversed negatives, numbers over 150, some screened entirely differently...altogether weird. I found one batch when I was in highschool, and none since. Swapped about half of them for the card I'd traded for the whole bunch a 74 McCovey Washington. DOH! And cheating a bit.......1978 Bazooka. I really need to scan that. Not officially an issued card, but they reused some cardstock with 78 Topps backs printed on it to make some bazooka boxes. I know of 2, maybe someone else saved one? Steve B |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sticking with " regular " issues, the 71 Topps is expensive, but not difficult, due to the black borders. The 72 set is difficult due to centering issues 9 if that's a criteria for you ), and the 77 set is difficult due to thinner card stock, some centering issues, and the cards are prone to chipping.
The test sets mentioned previously are darn near impossible to find at times, and when found are very expensive. So set completion for those items likely require some deep pockets. Unless they were purchased " back in the day ". ![]()
__________________
My new found obsession the t206! Last edited by KCRfan1; 08-22-2016 at 10:08 AM. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Buying 1950-59 Topps and Bowman Sets/ Near Sets / Partial Sets | Sean1125 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 08-08-2016 11:46 AM |
New pickup / why was this so difficult | bbcard1 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 1 | 03-20-2016 08:54 AM |
E90-2 Set Difficult? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 01-06-2008 09:09 AM |
sets started..sets finished...sets discarded | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 12-09-2007 11:50 AM |
Which one is more difficult? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 08-02-2004 06:52 PM |