 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
09-25-2014, 10:05 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Are Composite photos by nature type 3 or 4?
... or at least never type 1?
The specific nature of the question is from the 1909 Pirates photo in Huggins and Scott. This question came up in a thread a while back when Ben showed off his winnings in post 24, it was brought up again starting with post 30: http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=174349 I know that this photo is great either way, but should it be classified as a type 3 (or another type) and not a type 1?
__________________
https://www.flickr.com/photos/bn2cardz/albums 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Difference between Type 1 and Type 2 Press Photos... | jgmp123 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 38 | 05-05-2024 05:40 PM |
| The better angels of our nature... | David Atkatz | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 12 | 04-20-2012 09:06 AM |
| Original Photos / Type I photos and Autographs | CharleyBrown | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 12 | 12-05-2011 12:38 AM |
| Sequential & Composite Period Photos | D. Broughman | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 3 | 02-14-2011 05:26 AM |
| Type 1 Photos | HRBAKER | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 10 | 09-10-2010 07:22 PM |
Threaded Mode