![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is that printed on the back of the cardstock?
The back should have the white coated side showing. Or is it on some different cardboard? Very cool printing error. I've never seen one printed on the wrong sides, but have seen an ad for a handful of 72s that were like that. The price was way too much at the time. Printed on other cardstock could happen if there was a protector sheet as part of how the cardstock was packaged and it got used. I have a postcard back that's on packing material. It's the only one of those I've seen. Steve B |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just realized it can't be either because the lettering and uniform is white.
What the heck is that?! Steve B |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The back is normal. Some sort of test or prototype design ?
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Duh! That's the gold border version. There's also a blue, red, and purple bordered version too. The double chrome refractor numbered to 25 is the one you want though. Unless of course you are lucky enough to get the one with an authentic jock strap swatch.
__________________
Tiger collector Need: E121 Veach arms folded Monster Number 520/520 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Guaranteed worn ?
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It looks to me like someone took an exacto knife around the inked part of the card and peeled away the white border. It would have taken a long time to get that precise. But look how thin the red border is on the 'gold' card compared to the normal card, especially on the bottom.
I think I will try to duplicate this theory tonight. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I bought a couple from shoe heart on ebay this year as well for the variety and because they actually look really cool. There was no competition on either when I bought them, which surprised me. I thought there would be, but maybe since they were so unusual, maybe people thought they were home made or fake some how.
They are all the same glossiness and there is no missing layers that the naked eye could detect. mine have some light creasing, similar to what i have seen on sheet cut cards. I'm guessing this was some sort of test sheet that made it's way into someone's hands to be cut and sold later on. ![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1989 Topps Football & 1990 Topps Vending Cases | brian29575 | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 0 | 02-16-2014 07:29 PM |
Topps 1986 Oddity | ALR-bishop | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 15 | 12-02-2013 01:23 PM |
1951 Topps Red Backs Oddity | toppcat | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 15 | 06-13-2013 04:47 PM |
77 Topps back oddity | David W | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 1 | 03-03-2012 11:28 AM |
52 Topps Oddity | Robextend | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 12-09-2009 09:06 PM |