![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have been working on the T205 set for a few months now, and am learning quite a bit along the way.
I have focussed on buying graded cards, but recently picked one up online, and when it arrived, it looks strongly like it was trimmed, though carrying a clean PSA 4 grade. It is significantly smaller than the case, or others like it. Measured against other cards, it is about .3cm smaller horizontally. I assume there was some variance in cards back then, but is this within reason? Also, how common is it for one of the major grading services to miss something that appears quite obvious? Would you be more likely to just accept its legitimacy? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T206 size variance | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 06-26-2007 09:40 AM |
T205 Borders - Color Variance | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 04-14-2007 12:37 PM |
Size Variance??????? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 02-16-2007 07:20 AM |
Size Variance? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 01-26-2007 02:19 PM |
Zeenut size variance question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 04-15-2005 02:00 PM |