 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
04-11-2013, 04:55 PM
|
||||
|
||||
T206 - Higher Grade Or Rarer Back?
So I'm just getting into the HOFers in this set and have what I'm sure is a pretty basic question: when deciding on a purchase, is it better to obtain a card in higher condition or in lower condition with a rarer back? Aesthetically I can go either way, so I'm talking in terms of value down the line and rarity (condition rarity of the higher grade versus overall rarity of the tougher-backed example).
Anyways, was wondering if there's a prevailing view/axiom among collectors, such as, "Always go for the tougher back, etc." Thanks. Matt 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Why not a higher grade with a qualifier for tape on back? | Pat R | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 05-26-2012 04:52 PM |
| Wtb/wtt: T206 cobbs in mid grade or higher | CMIZ5290 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 04-14-2012 04:23 PM |
| looking for a 56 Clemente white back in higher grade | Zact | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 08-10-2011 03:37 PM |
| WTB: T206 Persons, any back, SGC-graded 30 or higher | wolf2039 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 09-13-2010 01:55 PM |
| Low Grade Rarer T206 Backs | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 08-21-2005 11:20 AM |
Threaded Mode