 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
01-01-2011, 04:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
My opinion on the matter-- re: type 1, generation 1 debate
It's known as friggin original. That's the word. Original. What's this type 1, generation 1 stuff?
While we're calling photos types 1 and gen 1s, how about we also start calling a trading card a 12554*9 and an antique vase a ghjhsd987sda. That sure will clear things up with collectors, right? Instead of baseball card collectors, let's start calling ourselves entities 8. 'Baseball card collector' is just too clear and obvious, we should make it convoluted. And that's my opinion on the matter. Last edited by drc; 01-01-2011 at 04:23 PM. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Vintage Type I Press Photos - 1936 Yankees, Carl Hubbell & Red Ruffing, 1937 NL AS's | D. Bergin | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 10-01-2009 12:00 AM |
| Vintage Type I Press Photos - 1936 Yankees, Carl Hubbell, Babe Didrikson & Jimmy Foxx | D. Bergin | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 09-30-2009 11:39 PM |
| E107 - Type I vs. Type II | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 32 | 07-17-2005 12:17 AM |
| Type Card Collection | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 07-15-2005 10:01 PM |
| Type collecting criteria | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 01-29-2003 10:29 AM |
Threaded Mode