![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ok first off I am not posting this so we can bash on a grading company, there are plenty of those threads already. I use both PSA and SGC and for the most part I have been very happy with the service they both provide. Over the last 7 years I have gotten a few cards that I felt were a little under or overgraded but it has always been close and I am ok with that, its a judgement call on their part.
Now today I just purchased my first card were I really think they got it way wrong. The card is my first T3 and I was very excited to finally own one but was a bit dismayed when I saw it. The card was graded a PSA 4 and cost almost $700, after looking at the back I noticed 3 small spots of paper loss as well as two dark stains plus a large light stain over most of the top back of the card. I just can't see how this got in the holder (its not tampered with I made sure that was not the case), to me I would not give it more than a Poor -Fair, plus where is the qualifier for the stains? I am providing scans so you all can look and let me know that I am not just being overly picky and should be a bit upset. What do you think this card should have graded? I am also looking for advice/help from anyone who might have already been down this road on what to do next. I am leaning towards calling Joe at PSA and seeing if he will make the situation right but I am open to what everyone else thinks. This is my first time down this road and don't want to be overreacting but at the same time I feel a bit like I was ripped off. Thanks in advance for any and all help. Scott ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Tough break on the T3. Did the seller provide scans of the back before you purchased the card? Does the seller accept returns? I would try to work with the seller first before contacting the grading company.
Hopefully you will be able to come to an acceptable agreement with whichever course you choose.
__________________
Current projects: White Sox prewar type set White Sox T206 Master set 1952 Topps set |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
first, card is not poor/fair, you're being way too harsh.
small card=small flaws, big card=blown-up flaws. card is a bit soiled, and stained....not at all uncommon in VG-VGEX cards. psa also is more lenient with back paper loss. i think the grading on this card is pretty much in line with their standard (whether you agree with it is another story). depending on front i'd give it at least VG... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I understand your disappointment,Scott.
IMHO the card should receive no higher than a Good. The staining and paper loss should not be that noticeable on a 700 dollar T3. I hope that you get your money back. best, barry |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I agree with the rest of the opinions here, talk to the seller and hopefully you can work something out.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I am with Quan on this one. I don't think it's that bad. I am not a T3 collector but I have noticed grading companies be a bit lenient in grading of large sized cards. I would say it's only 1 grade difference, maybe a 3. If there was a big back scan, upon purchase, then I am not sure there is a lot of room for disgruntlement, maybe a little bit, but not a lot. This is just my own opinion. Ya' gotta do what makes ya' happy.....BTW, I have a nice VG-EX E94 with spots of paper loss on the back, but the front is close to NRMT. ALSO, if I am not mistaking it actually looks like some of those spots of paper loss are not paper loss but extra paper on the card. Maybe some scrapbook paste residue? Those could probably easily be removed.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
As long as a scan was available in the listing, I don't think the seller should issue a refund on a graded card unless it's been tampered with or the holder is damaged. If no scan (of the back) was offered, why wouldn't the buyer have requested one, especially with a high dollar item like that? I ALWAYS request better or additional scans (if the originals are deficient in my opinion) before purchasing ANY card that costs more than $100 or so. Not a slam to the buyer in any way, but you have to be extra careful these days, especially with dealers you are unfamiliar with.
__________________
I Remember Now. ![]() |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think the trick to getting great T3's is find PSA1's that look EX but have a small pin hole. If I were collecting them, I'd buy them all day like that.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I know the first thing I do when I get a T3 is flip it over to see how great the checklist printing looks. What a raw deal. I'd agree that the mid-grade T3's are allowed more defects than a standard card.
Mac |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nice graded card boxes - advice....COMING SOON | jp1216 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 12-18-2012 03:28 PM |
Outstanding Graded Card storage case holds up to 150 | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 02-12-2009 07:06 PM |
1951 Berk Ross Panels many highest graded SOLD | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 01-18-2008 06:41 PM |
Exhibits for sale some highest graded | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 09-20-2007 06:56 PM |
Graded and Non Graded M116's For Sale | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 8 | 12-22-2006 06:51 PM |