![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#151
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: PC
-- |
#152
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: David Vargha
I too, had relatives who were killed in Nazi concentration camps. I don't find the card offensive. I'm sure the owner's intent wasn't to glorify Hitler. As the earlier poster alluded to, Santayana's adominition that those who fail to learn the lessons of history are doomed to repeat them is prescient to this day. Oversensitivity is the politically correct order of the day that I refuse to subscribe to. The post could have been made in bad taste, but I just don't see where it is in this instance. |
#153
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Hal Lewis
I agree 100% that the poster was saying that Hitler needed to be "soaked" as a form of punishment. |
#154
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Charlie Barokas
I agree, but why Hitler, why not Sammy Sosa or Barry Bonds? |
#155
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Hal Lewis
I don't think Sosa or Bonds could retain any more water than their bloated steroid-filled bodies are already holding. |
#156
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
Thought I would take a few minutes to clear up some obvious confusion, misinformation and misconceptions presented. Not sure if this information will be appreciated or not welcomed at all. Just the facts, Ma’am. Like it or not this is the state of the hobby and has been for sometime. Thought you should know this so you can remove all doubt and stop with the supposition. For some of you this will be a nightmare come true, others it will merely corroborate what you already knew but did not want to truly accept. The grading companies are well aware of it as you should be since you are buying the stuff they grade. |
#157
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Josh K.
My last post did not assume any ill motive on the part of the poster - nevertheless, I dont think the post was clear as to its point, obviously open to misinterpretation, and could have been better thought out. To some, the image alone is offensive enough. |
#158
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: steve f
Rec'd a note that this post was mispercieved . |
#159
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Josh K.
Not a problem Steve, like I said just above, I really didnt think the post was intended to be offensive, just wasnt sure what the intent was. Thanks for the explanation. |
#160
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Charlie Barokas
Steve, |
#161
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: scott ingold
None taken Steve. |
#162
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Hal Lewis
I guess that is ONE benefit to slabbing: |
#163
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Charlie Barokas
Trimming has gotten so good that in many cases every Grading company cannot detect it. It is a significant problem. The grading companies must find a way to stay ahead of the "trimmers" because newer technologies has made the practice easier and undectable. In my opinion, that is why pre-war cards graded 7 or less have been so on fire. |
#164
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Peter Spaeth
Assuming dealers are trimming, they aren't going to admit it, and other dealers and collectors who know apparently aren't going to "out" them, so I don't see how the scenario Charlie mentions happens. |
#165
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Hal Lewis
Can't the graders just MEASURE the cards? |
#166
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Charlie Barokas
How do you know who is trimming cards? Anyone who's submissions to grading companies have 80% "9's" 10% "9.5's/10's" and 5% no grade and 5% 7. Mint and Gem Mint cards used to be scarce, but now they are growing on trees. Did Mr. Mint (the Boards favorite guy) find a bunch of uncirculated cards recently because that's what a Mint or a Gem Mint card is" uncirculated. I have talked with 30 Year hobby veterans and they are still looking for one uncirculated hobby find. Its amazing how some dealers find them every couple of weeks. |
#167
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Josh K.
Charlie, |
#168
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Charlie Barokas
Hal, |
#169
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Hal Lewis
This thread is getting very scary. |
#170
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Charlie Barokas
Josh, |
#171
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Charlie Barokas
Hal, |
#172
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Josh K.
charlie, |
#173
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Charlie Barokas
Having said all of this, I think the grading companies are aware of it and in there own ways are trying to fight back. But if you can trim a card in such a way that Mike Baker cannot detect it? Because Baker has the best eye and most experience in the business, not to take away from SGC or PSA but he has incredible knowledge about edges etc. |
#174
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Peter Spaeth
Charlie I understand why you would not want to name names. But until someone names names, or a doctor or a dealer confesses, I don't think any progress is going to be made. |
#175
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Josh K.
So, just what kind of Doctor is Dr. Duet anyway? |
#176
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: David Vargha
Josh -- Take one of the cert #'s on any card and start running searches on cert #'s immediately before and after that. Doing that on PSA wil often give you some "interesting" results; especially when it is 9's and 10's punctuated by "evid. of trim". |
#177
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Josh K.
Thanks David - good advice. Fortunately, Im not buying any prewar 9s and 10s (or 7s or 8s for that matter). |
#178
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Charlie Barokas
Josh, |
#179
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Josh K.
I agree in some respects, though I dont want to be the owner of the psa 4 that had a wrinkle pressed out only to find out it has returned after the card was slabbed. |
#180
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Hal Lewis
It must take a lot of guts for someone to "soak and press and trim" a 1952 Topps Mantle card in an effort to raise the grade. |
#181
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Peter Spaeth
As many of you know, way back in 1996 in VBCC #7, "Daniel Paul" (not the name he "operates" under) stated flatly that when done properly certain types of restoration were virtually impossible to detect. |
#182
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: identify7
I don't know, but I think that stretching photographs would require more than deionized water followed by pressing with books. |
#183
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: scott ingold
I remember on the CU boards (David might as well ) That someone copied and pasted just what was mentioned. A sub # was checked as well as all of the one's before and after. What it showed was a bunch of 9's and 10's with just as many "eve" of trim sprinkled in. I forget who the submiter was but it was one of the larger ebay dealers. Don't the graders notice this ? |
#184
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: scott ingold
Charlie, |
#185
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Hal Lewis
Is THAT why all of the old copies of VBCC Issue #7 are never available anywhere?? |
#186
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Josh K.
scott, |
#187
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: scott ingold
Josh, |
#188
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Charlie Barokas
Scott, |
#189
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Charlie Barokas
I mentioned Mike Baker being the Best. I also want to say that SGC and Dave Foreman, are doing a great Job of Holdering only the right cards. |
#190
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Josh K.
Charlie - now please tell me who the trimmers are so I can pose the question |
#191
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Peter Spaeth
Charlie your posts seem conflicting to me, on the one hand as I read you anyhow you are saying lots of trimmed cards are getting into high grade holders, on the other hand you are praising the grading services for doing a great job of catching trimmed cards. Help me understand what you are saying. |
#192
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Josh K.
I read it the following: |
#193
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Lee Behrens
How about a clinic at this summers National on soaking and then we can have a debate. When that is done we all go to eat and laugh about it. I laugh just thinking about the soaking being done like it is a chemistry class at home. |
#194
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Charlie Barokas
Peter, |
#195
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Richard
Since the topic has now gravitated towards trimming, and the various methods of how it is done, I think that we can start talking about the trimming of modern cards, and how difficult it is to detect factory trimming that happend last month at Topps or Upper Deck vs. trimming after the fact to enhance the card: |
#196
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: joe
I guess this is a record for a thread. It's been beat to death. Soakers say it's ok. Collectors with soaked cards in their collections can't tell anyway. So everybody should be happy. This same subject has crept into another thread too. About the Cobb and grading companies. How about started a thread about fixing cards so they can be graded, not soaking. Someone told me there is a couple of young guys on the West coast who have been doing this for years. The grading company knew who he was and he was not able to submit cards under his name. So, he has someone else send the cards in or take them to a show for grading. The last I heard they were buying properties in Florida as investment with their large profits on "altered" cards that were able to be graded. Anyone else heard this story. |
#197
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Richard
Joe, are you talking about altering modern cards or prewar cards? |
#198
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jim Crandell
One very well known national dealer who used to post here named names(I think on the CU boards) and I think regrets it. He has subsequently mentioned how it has hurt his business. As I recall, he named 5 well known dealers who are involved in card alteration. |
#199
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jim Crandell
Another dealer who is very knowledgeable about what is being done is Michael Wentz--and he is not one of the people I am referring to in the above post. |
#200
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: joe
Richard, was never told what kind of cards. Now that you post the question I would bet it was not on vintage cards that we talk about on this board. I forgot how much money was being spent on some of the modern cards. I just wondered if anyone else had heard anything about it. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
About soaking cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 351 | 08-06-2008 01:08 PM |
soaking an Old Judge | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 07-12-2008 06:06 PM |
Soaking question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 01-27-2007 08:26 PM |
Soaking question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 04-01-2006 10:24 AM |
Question on pressing | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 06-25-2002 02:12 PM |