![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#101
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
Here is the list from the Sovereign Thread |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian Weisner
|
#103
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
I have added Doc White (pitching) and Vic Willis (throwing) to the list of No-Prints. These two cards |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
Thanks for your inputs and neat scans....Jim R....Art M....BcD....Brian W. |
#105
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
To date total = 95.....interestingly, 44 of the Subjects are Minor Leaguers and there are |
#106
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Pennsylvania Ted
Can you explain why so many Bresnahan's lead the "pack" here with these Broad Leaf backs ? |
#107
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian Weisner
|
#108
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
Nice going on the Smith and Kleinow.....Piedmont 460/42 cards you displayed on the other Thread. |
#109
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
In an earlier post on this Thread, we have determined that there are approx. 192 possible Subjects |
#110
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Pennsylvania Ted
Last chance to show us your BROAD LEAF 350 cards....even if we have yours already on the confirmed list. |
#111
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimB
I apologize for my delayed response to this thread. I have two additions not on the list: |
#112
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
JimB |
#113
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
UPDATED to include 2 inputs from JimB and one from a "reader" who emailed me. |
#114
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bill
Ted, |
#115
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
You have to send me an updated Spread Sheet. You must of had a huge number of inputs |
#116
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
Thanks for the updated SS.....but, all I see are minute marks that have been added to |
#117
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
To date total = 124....interestingly, of these Subjects, 53 are Minor Leaguers and there are 9 reported |
#118
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
I believe I can predict, with a high level of certainty, which cards in the T206 set exist with BL 350 |
#119
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
probably a dumb question but what back is the rarest on these cards? and what does it do to the price if compared to a common back? thanks |
#120
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
MIKE |
#121
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
New inputs...... |
#122
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
You know 1000 times more than I about T206 but I would also say the Ty Cobb back cards have a different gloss, not unlike the T213-2 series, and unlike other T206's. Also, in my short tenure I have seen far more Drums than BL460's.....but I will defer to your expertise over mine anyday.... |
#123
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian Weisner
Hi Leon, |
#124
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Judson Hamlin
Ted- Found some more records that I had been keeping from 93-99 or so and can add the following to the list: |
#125
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barry arnold
Ted, |
#126
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
I didn't mention the glossiness on the the front of the TY Cobb/Ty Cobb card, since nowadays, all (or most) |
#127
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
To date total = 136....interestingly, of these Subjects, 60 are Minor Leaguers and there are 10 reported |
#128
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
Thanks for all your inputs, they are in the new updated list. |
#129
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dylan
If the Ty Cobb w/Cobb back is not part of the T206 set, then which set is it a part of? Are you suggesting that it makes up a set all by itself? I would consider it a part of the T206 set but only regionally produced. Also take into consideration that the Cobb pose on the front of the card is not part of any other set. |
#130
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
New inputs..... |
#131
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
The Ty Cobb/Ty Cobb card is indeed a mystery. But, because of the different style of printing on |
#132
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dylan
Well from that point of view ted you can argue that both polar bear, produced in factory #6, and el principe de Gales, produced in factory #17, are both unique sets due to no other brands using their factory designations. Just like Cobb and factory 33. I agree that the card is mysterious, but the circumstantial evidence imo still points to it being a part of T206 until something more concrete showing otherwise is discovered. |
#133
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
DYLAN |
#134
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
New inputs..... |
#135
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
To date total = 143....interestingly, of these Subjects, 64 are Minor Leaguers and there are 10 reported |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T206's For Sale: Broad Leaf 460 & Sweeney No B | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 07-28-2008 11:48 AM |
Known autographed T206's and show and tell... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 10-10-2007 05:34 PM |
T206 SURVEY..Broad Leaf 460..show or tell ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 09-06-2007 09:42 PM |
WANTED: Broad Leaf 460 | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 3 | 01-14-2007 01:34 PM |
Are 1948 Leaf's Considered Vintage? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 28 | 04-20-2005 06:46 AM |