![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#51
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
"Punk Kid" |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Matt R
I really find this disturbing if the original poster is telling the truth (and my gut feeling is that he is telling the truth). |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: howard
Chuck, whether or not PCG is a legit company there is little doubt to me that the Mantle card is terribly misgraded. It is off center, faded and has soft corners. There is no way it is NM+. If they can't properly grade such a high profile card I would not trust them. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Matt R
Agreed Howard, it's definitely not near mint. My question would be whether or not it's authentic. Something is shouting counterfeit at me. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
I tend to agree with you in hindsight. This anonymous post really shouldn't have been let go. The rule is there for a reason, as the other ones pertaining to anonymity, and they are tried and true and work. Once the genie is out of the bottle it's hard to put him back in. I was trying to think of a reason when even a dealer would want to remain anonymous. I guess it could be that there are repercussions for doing so ie... harsher grades if more cards were sent in. Since "Freddie" mentioned both PSA and SGC I didn't really think it was a favoritism thing. In hindsight it shouldn't have been let go though.....I agree too...if you don't like a grading company, or grading in general, then don't do it...regards |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Eric Brehm
I agree with Joe D. and others who see third party grading, on balance, as a benefit to the hobby. I re-entered the hobby in 2006, after a 20 year hiatus, and when I saw that cards were now being graded and encapsulated by professional specialists, I immediately accepted it as a good method to significantly reduce the uncertainty associated with buying and selling, such as we dealt with in the old days, when verbal condition descriptions were all over the map. If consistency of communication about condition is the goal, it certainly seems better to me than it used to be, albeit imperfect. |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve
I wonder why "Freddie" did not mention GAI? |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Joseph Shirley
I can't help but think about how all these crack outs overinflate the pop reports at PSA. There are now 2 PSA 5's that don't exist. |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve
I can't help but think how anyone here believed this crap. lol |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Paul S
Well, Elton John told me that Roger Daltry confirmed Freddy Mercury's story. |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jeff Lichtman
Freddy announced he wished to remain anonymous "for good reason." Does PSA send out hit teams to silence its critics? |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bilko G
|
#63
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JK
"I was trying to think of a reason when even a dealer would want to remain anonymous." |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brad L.
Geez, I would have at least stopped at the 2nd five to recoup some of my grading fees. Why would you send the 5 back a second time knowing that it could drop in grade again??? No offense, but that seems really stupid from here. |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian
What is a hit team? |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Tim Kinserlow
Steve has a point. If a person really thinks about it, GAI might not have been mentioned for a good reason. |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Matt R
If you are referring to me, then you are mistaken. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1953 Howell RC PSA 7 1961 DeJordy RC PSA 7 1965 Cheevers RC PSA 7.5 For Sale | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 01-15-2009 10:30 AM |
FS-T207's Mullin No D PSA 6 (highest graded),McDonald PSA 6 (1 higher), Henry PSA 3 | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 12-03-2007 05:30 AM |