![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I guess they figured if they used all of the A & G N designations they'd be bound to be right on at least one of them...
Just to spread the love, though, check out my newly-arrived 'T205' from SGC: ![]()
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ever wish grading companies had an un-slab option? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 08-14-2008 03:58 PM |
Preferential treatment by grading companies? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 02-17-2007 12:45 AM |
future of grading companies | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 06-22-2005 07:27 AM |
Differences in grading companies ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 07-08-2003 04:33 PM |
Love them grading companies! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 10-10-2001 10:56 AM |