 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
04-16-2012, 08:02 AM
|
|||
|
|||
So here is the million dollar question then. Should it be only the Piedmont Fact 25 Blue Signature on front or should each card be labeled as such with the appropriate signature color and the emphasis being that Pied fact. 25 Blue being the hardest. I would think that Graham Blue Signature on front for only the Piedmont Fact 25 would be a good label. Any thoughts?
Even though the Black signature is far less plentiful on the Graham FB combos the Blue Signature Piedmont Fact 25 will be the the rarer of the 2. There can at anytime be 5 to 1 Black to blue Piedmont 25. I have only seen a few over the past few months and think there will be far less now. BTW if anyone has any to show it would be nice to possibly see what the ratio we as board members may have. I also believe that the sweet caporal reds have the same blue and black signature variation Last edited by Pup6913; 04-16-2012 at 08:03 AM. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New T205 Variation Graham "Blue Signature" | Pup6913 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 08-11-2011 12:13 PM |
| WTB: David Shean and George Graham T205 CUBS | npa589 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 07-12-2011 09:39 PM |
| WTB T205 Graham or Shean | t206 cubs | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 12-23-2010 05:49 PM |
| T205 Peaches Graham Questionable Ebay Auction | Tcards-Please | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 05-14-2009 04:10 PM |
| For Discussion: Relative Values of T206 and T205 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 06-02-2006 09:57 AM |
Threaded Mode