![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think that, coupled with the irreversible nature of lamination. Collectors don't like to be locked into previous owners' storage/display preferences. Photos are removed from or placed in frames, matting colors changed, items are broken out of or placed into slabs, taken out of toploaders and placed in sleeves, etc. Even if the laminate itself is in good condition and crystal clear, it's a preservation/display choice made by a previous owner that can't be altered (at least, not without professional restoration, which comes at great expense).
Also, I'm wondering if the laminate affects the ability to authenticate a signature, the same way as being in a plastic sleeve or framed under glass would? I'll leave that to others more knowledgable than I to touch on. Last edited by thecatspajamas; 02-01-2012 at 02:57 PM. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mears Bulletin Board Question | John V | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 7 | 06-20-2010 05:34 AM |
Question for Photo Experts | rman444 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 6 | 03-23-2010 02:18 PM |
Vintage autograph value question. | Lordstan | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 7 | 09-21-2009 10:41 PM |
Question on Autograph Authentication | IronHorse2130 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 3 | 05-06-2009 03:41 AM |
November board contest......tough question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 37 | 11-26-2007 01:54 PM |