 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Should T206s have their own BST section? | |||
| Yes |
   
|
62 | 52.10% |
| No- Leave it alone it's not broken. |
  
|
43 | 36.13% |
| I don't care. |
  
|
14 | 11.76% |
| Voters: 119. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
12-31-2011, 11:12 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Successful deals with: scmavl, buymycards, nicedoctor, kutcher55, aaamchenry, brianvanhorn, jburl, tonyo, benge610, highlanderfan, westwin, cardsmemro, 27Championships, et al. My needs lists: W514 strip cards W515-2 strip cards 
|
|
#2
12-31-2011, 12:07 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Definitely yes - the t cards that arent 206's, and yes those exist on here, could stay on the main page longer. It just seems like both factions would win here. Trial attempt? Im curious what the voting breaks down with t206 collectors versus non-collectors. The nons seems to be more in favor of a new t206 bst...
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| T206 antecedents.Photography and Lithography behind the T206s. | ethicsprof | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 25 | 12-10-2011 02:49 PM |
| What do you love about T206s? | Blunder19 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 01-06-2011 10:37 PM |
| Should scans be required on the BST board? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 59 | 03-07-2009 10:17 AM |
| Posting on the BST | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-21-2007 10:30 AM |
| REAL T206s | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 01-09-2003 06:50 PM |
Hybrid Mode
