 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22
10-27-2011, 10:50 PM
|
||||
|
||||
True and all it is doing imo is making them both look bad. I am a subscriber to VCP and I think that data is important and should be in there. I have also been a consigner to B & L and I want my lots to have as many bidders as possible and I dont like finding out they could be reaching a larger audience and are not.
This is a PR snafu for both, I really question is it worth the bad press over $100? 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PSA Graded 50s-60s; Mays, Cox RC, Ted Williams; Priced near or Below VCP Average | BIN at VCP | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 5 | 08-03-2010 12:58 PM |
| O/T VCP vs Card Pricer | Pup6913 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 10-28-2009 05:53 AM |
| VCP vs. AOL | Jim VB | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 07-17-2009 07:38 PM |
| Cardpricer vs. VCP? | jlynch1960 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 05-15-2009 06:42 AM |
| VCP price change | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 88 | 07-29-2008 05:24 PM |
Threaded Mode