![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
very neat, especially as the two Bridwells both have the light red printed slightly to the right.
Anderson can't be from the same sheet. Anderson is a 350 while Bridwell is a 350-460 series. I don't see these as printing mistakes. Unless they were making single prints directly from the plate that sort of misprint would be unique. To have two of them so identical tells me it's a difference on the plate. Possibly from one position on the stone being done out of place and later redone. I'll consider them variations, a distinction I make a bit more readily than most. I generally don't think most minor variations should be worth more either, so I suppose the end result is the same. Steve B |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T206 "350-460" Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 03-26-2007 04:45 PM |
A T206 printing question for Bill Heitman, or anyone ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 62 | 03-06-2007 02:52 PM |
T206 Howie Camnitz PSA 10 question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 05-11-2005 07:39 PM |
T206 Beckley sale question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 10-04-2004 04:42 PM |
T206 Ty Cobb Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 06-09-2002 12:21 PM |