 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13
07-03-2011, 02:18 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I'm just going to say that I think it's stupid that SGC doesn't clearly state their qualifiers (MC, OC, etc.) like PSA does. Why are they leaving it up to interpretation as to why a card got a grade? If this card gets a 5 or 6 from PSA with the qualifier, at least there is no debate as to WHAT the qualifier is.
What if you send SGC a card with great corners that is heavily off-center, AND it has a small pencil mark, and it comes back, oh, at 20. Well, which one was the larger determinant in getting that low grade? I hate having to interpret this, and IMO, it's the reason they'll always be inferior to PSA. People paying thousands of dollars for cards want to know EXACTLY what they're buying. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Please explain sgc grading | Merrillstoys | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 03-21-2010 03:29 PM |
| Cracker Jack Blowout | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 4 | 01-16-2009 07:46 PM |
| M101-5 Blank backs all SGC graded | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 03-03-2008 05:15 PM |
| 1914 and 1915 CRACKER JACKS | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 14 | 12-08-2006 11:49 AM |
| My First Experiance with SGC and grading. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 09-10-2003 08:16 PM |
Threaded Mode