|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 
 | 
|  | 
| 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|  dunno 
			
			I guess you would have to call PSA customer service for the answer as to what they will do on their flips. A of pedigree will sometimes add a little value but rarely very much, in my experience. I doubt most collectors would pay much of a premium because of who owned the item previously. Of course there could be extraordinary circumstances where folks would pay more but in general, not too much...
		 
				__________________ Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com | 
| 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   
			
			There could be at least one circumstance where collectors would pay a premium based on who previously owned a card. Because there is always a concern about doctored cards getting slabbed, one from a long time collector such as Lionel Carter would likely garner more interest. We know Carter put most of his collection together half a century ago, so cards from him are virtually certain to have never been doctored. Provenance is always highly valued, in pretty much any field of collecting.
		 | 
| 
			 
			#3  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|  If I am not mistaking.... Quote: 
 
				__________________ Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com | 
| 
			 
			#4  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			The value attributed to a pedigreed card can range from 0% to many multiples of the cards regular value. I know people who have no use for them and others (like myself) that collect pedigreed cards. In this case of the Mayo owned by Casey Stengel, I paid a premium (maybe double the card's value at the time) just to have it. While I have picked up some Lionel Carter & Frank Nagy's at or below book. But if a different issue Carter pops up that I don't have, I would indeed pay a premium to obtain it.   | 
| 
			 
			#5  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   
			
			Didn't know that some of Carter's cards were trimmed. I assume those were all properly placed in AUTH holders.
		 | 
| 
			 
			#6  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   
			
			If the card can be shown to come from a auction of the person's items, I would think that would be good enough.  If you have the catalog page and proof your card is the card on that catalog page, that would be enough I'd think.  I don't know the history of your cards, so this is just an example. If you have strong enough documentation, you wouldn't have to have the label to demonstrate the provenance to a prospective buyer. Last edited by drc; 05-27-2011 at 11:30 AM. | 
| 
			 
			#7  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   Quote: 
 Here is a group of 4 diff issues I scanned awhile ago, the T207 is trimmed and marked as Auth.   | 
|  | 
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| 
 | 
 | 
|  Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | 
| Financial Times Feature Story on Lelands and Sports Memorabilia | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 09-18-2007 11:07 AM | 
| Non Baseball Memorabilia | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 14 | 08-25-2007 01:08 PM | 
| Announcing a new forum- Net54 Memorabilia Forum | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 32 | 05-09-2007 11:18 AM | 
| The Memorabilia Road Show is a No Show | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 12-05-2004 08:47 PM | 
| The Memorabilia Road Show Hosted by Ed Kranepool | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 11-25-2004 12:04 AM |