 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
04-26-2011, 06:58 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Even though the Standard Catalog may be off in regard to actual prices realized, would it be considered "relatively" accurate if it is used for relative values to determine which "commons" are not really that common?
For example SCD std catalog has Bresnahan at $350 in vg (as mentioned above), but Hank Butcher is $300 while Howie Camnitz is $70, Harry Davis is $50, Barney Pelty is $500 and Rube Marquard is $120 - just to pick some random VG values. Does the Standard Catalog represent a good relative scale? Last edited by tonyo; 04-26-2011 at 06:59 PM. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Pricing | Railroad Bill | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 1 | 12-06-2010 07:20 AM |
| Question about T206 back pricing | cwazzy | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 10-27-2009 06:46 PM |
| Pricing question on T206 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 12-01-2008 02:13 PM |
| population reports on prewar commons vs. pricing | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 08-21-2005 10:54 PM |
| The Trader Speaks pricing from 1974 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 02-03-2005 07:33 AM |
Threaded Mode