 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
01-25-2011, 07:10 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Catalogued version is right. Original card had born in 1931 on the back (error). Next version was an obvious attempt to change the '3' and make it a '2'. The last version is the correct 1921 date. The higher prices that the 2nd version generate are a bit odd. Doesn't appear to be any harder to obtain.
|
|
#2
01-25-2011, 08:00 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks for the responses. I'm not to "clued in" to the modern issues and variations. I guess this goes into the same category as the 1989 (I think) Fleer Billy Ripken card where the end of the bat has three different variations: FF, blocked out or "scratched out". Something like that.
I figured the "obscured 3" on the Spahn card was just a print defect, which to me would mean that it is a defect more than it is a variation. Perhaps it was Topps way of trying to correct their mistake. Again, thanks!
__________________
fr3d c0wl3s - always looking for OJs and other 19th century stuff. PM or email me if you have something cool you're looking to find a new home for.
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Question concerning PSA Grading of Kelloggs | theseeker | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 10-07-2010 12:23 PM |
| PSA Graded T-206's for Sale | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 4 | 09-21-2006 09:19 PM |
| Lots Of HOF'ers -- Mostly Post-War | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 05-01-2006 08:44 PM |
| Those with Questions about PSA grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 05-26-2005 02:05 PM |
| Question about PSA grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 11-15-2001 09:50 AM |
Hybrid Mode
