 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6
01-24-2011, 06:41 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Joe you are confusing why a card gets the grade it gets vs how the card looks and appeals to you. The 10 Wajo deserves the grade it got based on the damage it has on the back, thats its technicial grade but each of us does our own grading/value based on our own factors.
An example, some people are centering freaks and thats there most important factor for them and they would much rather have a well centered 6 vs a 7 thats a little OC. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Flaking vs. paper loss | Orions father | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 10-13-2010 09:08 PM |
| WTT: HUGE tradelist of T205, T206, T207 & E90-1 | marcdelpercio | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 9 | 08-15-2009 10:43 AM |
| Whats the story on grading when there is paper loss? | cobblove | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 08-08-2009 03:50 PM |
| border chipping vs paper loss | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 05-06-2008 02:40 PM |
| paper loss | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 01-30-2006 02:09 AM |
Threaded Mode